The day after Glencore PLC GLNCY +1.14%increase launched an unsolicited US$23.1-billion takeover offer for Canada’s Teck Resources Ltd. TECK-B-T -0.51%decrease, and Gary Nagle, Glencore’s chief executive officer, expounded publicly for hours on its merits, the giant Swiss miner has gone silent.
And no wonder.
Norman B. Keevil, whose family investment vehicle controls Teck’s class A super voting shares, told The Globe and Mail that the venerable Canadian mining company, which has been in operation for more than half a century, must remain in Canadian hands. A sellout to Glencore is not in the cards, he said. “It’s not a matter of price, Canada is not for sale.”
Mr. Keevil’s comments recalled the late Peter Munk’s condemnation of the foreign takeover of one big Canadian mining company after another in the mid-2000s. The founder of Barrick Gold Corp. in 2006 urged corporate Canada not to be meek, to fight back, and not simply sell out to the highest bidder.
Investors are now wondering what Glencore’s next move will be after Mr. Keevil invoked similar fiery economic nationalism to explain his rejection of any Glencore takeover of Teck, no matter what the price.
“He is a fiercely proud Canadian, and rightly so,” Dalton Baretto, analyst with Canaccord Genuity Corp., said in an e-mail.
“That said, Glencore would clearly have known that as well, and factored it into their calculus, although at this point I’m not sure how they plan to get around it.”
So what are Glencore’s options?
It will almost certainly try to sway Mr. Keevil, even if his mind already appears made up.
“Dr. Keevil is a critical stakeholder,” Glencore’s Mr. Nagle said Monday in a media call.
“We certainly would not want to bypass him, or go around him. We respect what he’s built, and we will seek to engage further with him, around the potential value creation that this proposal brings.”
Some analysts, including Christopher LaFemina, with Jefferies, are expecting Glencore to hike its takeover proposal, a strategy that may not make sense in this instance.
In a note to clients, Scotia Capital Inc.’s Orest Wowkodaw said that even in the event of a higher offer from Glencore, the likelihood of it working “is very low.” That’s because of the stranglehold Mr. Keevil and Japan’s Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. have on the A shares.
More than half of the A shares are owned by the Keevil family and Sumitomo. Each A share carries 100 votes, compared with one vote for a B share. Mr. Keevil told The Globe on Monday that Sumitomo and he are completely aligned in their thinking.
However, even if a higher takeover offer has no influence over Mr. Keevil and Sumitomo, it potentially could affect the outcome of the shareholder vote that Teck will be holding later this month. Then investors will weigh in on whether they are on board with Teck’s plans to split itself into two separate units, one holding its legacy metallurgical coal unit, and the other holding its copper and zinc assets, a transaction that was announced in February. At least two-thirds of both the class A and class B shareholders must vote in favour for it to succeed.
“The April 26th vote will be critical,” Mr. Baretto said, “as the class B shareholders will vote independently and can make their views known.”
Glencore said Monday if Teck’s vote succeeds, its proposed takeover of Teck is dead in the water.
But if the vote fails, Glencore, at the very least, has a lot more time to try to get its own takeover proposal of Teck done.
Glencore declined an interview with The Globe and Mail on Tuesday