Author: Consultant

  • Police say Canadian woman slapped teen over Trump and ICE clothing before ICE detained her

    A Canadian woman living in New Jersey is now facing charges after being accused of attacking a teen wearing pants that displayed “Trump” and “ICE” on the boardwalk.

    According to a report from NJ.com, Kaitlyn E. Tracey, 33, allegedly “slapped the victim across her face and body.”

    It happened after police say she approached the group of teens while recording them on her phone on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk.

    Tracey reportedly did not jive with the group’s “patriotic colored sweatpants with political wording,” police said.

    The Point Pleasant Beach Police Department said it happened Friday night, July 3, during the start of the Fourth of July holiday weekend; surveillance video captured her allegedly “striking the juvenile female, once to the body and once to the face, with an open hand.”

    📩 Send me a story idea: kelsie.cairns@fox.com

    📸 Instagram: kelsiecairns_tv

    🎥 Facebook: Kelsie Cairns

    She then ran off from the scene. Days later, Tracey was arrested on charges following an investigation into the case.

    Police confirm Tracey is facing charges of endangering the welfare of a child, simple assault, harassment, and obstruction.

    Tracey, who is a Canadian citizen, came to the U.S. in 2024 with a passport, the report says.

    On Tuesday, a man claiming to be Tracey’s husband posted a tearful plea on social media regarding the incident. In the video he said, “Yesterday July 13, my wife was detained by ICE and brought to Delaney Hall in North New Jersey.”

    A search of the ICE detainee locator confirms Tracey is in ICE custody at the Delaney Hall facility.

  • The Bank of Canada faces a growing credibility challenge

    In a world increasingly characterized by economic shocks and diminishing trust in public institutions, the Bank of Canada faces a growing credibility challenge: Maintain public trust as inflation is increasingly shaped by forces monetary policy cannot control.

    A recent Bank of Canada staff paper finds that supply shocks since 2022 have been larger than those experienced before the pandemic. As a result, a more volatile economy makes inflation exceed the bank’s target more frequently and for longer, while increasing the likelihood that restoring price stability comes at the expense of weaker real economic activity or higher unemployment than Canadians might consider acceptable.

    Still, the central bank needs to convince Canadians these difficult policy decisions are being made in their best interest.

    The bank’s challenge is harder still in an environment where expertise is increasingly contested, AI is facilitating misinformation and polarization is growing worldwide.

    Canada’s inflation rate rises to 3.2% in May, highest in more than two years

    As it prepares to renew its five-year monetary policy framework by the end of 2026, the bank has been consulting a range of stakeholders since November, 2024, including consumers, large banks and pension funds, economists, and representatives of youth and retired Canadians. It shared information from these consultations on its website, noting that “concerns about the politicization of the bank over the past few years” came up repeatedly.

    Back in 2024, the Bank of Canada’s own Public Awareness Survey found that less than half of Canadians (47 per cent) trusted it to act in their best interest. About the same proportion (48 per cent) trusted the central bank to maintain low and stable inflation.

    At the end of 2024, inflation had fallen below 2 per cent, down from a 40-year peak above 8 per cent in June, 2022. It is now at 3.2 per cent, back outside the central bank’s operational range of 1 per cent to 3 per cent, much of it owing to energy prices. Core inflation, excluding food and energy, is half as much at 1.6 per cent in May, below the 2 per cent target.

    Opinion: Bank of Canada has too rosy a view of the world

    Yet such a low core number does not square with what Canadians feel.

    The bank also consults with community members across Canada, recently capturing the results in a May report, which said there was “widespread concern” that the inflation figure “does not align with real-life experiences” and community members questioned whether policymakers understood the pressures ordinary households face. Many objected to excluding food and energy from measures of underlying inflation because those are among the expenses they feel most directly.

    This disconnect between the inflation the bank measures and the affordability pressures Canadians experience, the stakeholder consultation summary warns, “can lead to diminished trust in inflation data and, by extension, in the bank.”

    “Consumer groups noted that the bank’s communications seem tailored to market participants and business leaders as opposed to the public. This created a perception that the bank is not concerned about the impact of its decisions on Canadians’ financial well-being,” the consultation summary said.

    “To foster greater confidence in the bank, many stakeholders advocated for more plain language and accessible explanations of bank decisions that relate more directly to people’s experience with inflation.”

    Opinion: Why the BoC’s next move will be to cut rates, sending the loonie to 65 US cents

    Plain and clear language is only one dimension of transparency, itself a cornerstone of credibility. It also depends on how information is communicated, what information is shared and whether Canadians understand how difficult it is to reach policy decisions.

    The Bank of Canada has come a long way in that respect. For instance, it had resisted publishing the equivalent of the Federal Reserve’s meeting minutes for years, arguing that doing so could inhibit frank discussion within the governing council. It eventually introduced its summary of deliberations in 2023, giving Canadians greater insight into the competing views behind policy decisions. The bank holds press conferences after its policy decisions and has also provided alternative scenarios around its baseline projections when uncertainty has proved too high, as was the case from April, 2025, through January, 2026.

    Should the bank go further by publishing a projected interest-rate path, as once suggested by the International Monetary Fund and similar to the Federal Reserve’s dot plot? Its own research suggests that is unlikely. A staff analytical paper found that policy-rate forecasts are typically not informative beyond one or two quarters and risk creating a false sense of certainty. The point extends beyond Canada: Fed Chair Kevin Warsh declined to submit an interest-rate projection at his first meeting as chair, stressing that such forecasts were “not helpful in the conduct of policy.”

  • July 15: Bank of Canada keeps interest rate unchanged at 2.25% for sixth consecutive time

    The Bank of Canada kept its benchmark interest rate at 2.25 per cent for the sixth consecutive time amid oil price volatility and improving domestic data. The bank said it expects inflation to decline in the coming months, and economic activity to pick up. But it said the path forward will depend to a significant degree on the war in the Middle East and the U.S. trade policy.

    Governor Tiff Macklem and senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers will hold a press conference at 10:45 a.m. ET. The event is being held virtually, owing to a strike by security personnel at the bank, and will start 15 minutes later than usual.

    Key moments:

  • U.S. consumer inflation slowed in June as gasoline prices retreated

    U.S. inflation cooled last month as the cost of gas, clothes, and used cars fell, providing some relief to consumers, while underlying price pressures also cooled more than expected.

    Prices dropped 0.4 per cent from May to June, the largest monthly drop in four years, the Labor Department said Tuesday. On a yearly basis, inflation declined to 3.5 per cent, down from a year-over-year gain of 4.2 per cent in May and lower than many economists expected.

    Yet oil prices rose for a second day Tuesday as the United States renewed attacks on Iran and President Donald Trump announced a new blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for about one-fifth of the world’s oil. And many Americans have soured on the economy after five years of elevated inflation, posing a risk to Trump and Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections.

    Still, excluding the food and energy categories, core prices were unchanged in June, a positive sign that underlying inflation is cooling. On a yearly basis, core prices rose just 2.6 per cent, down from 2.9 per cent the previous month. Core inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 per cent.

    The core figures suggest that the gas price spike from the Iran war, while it pushed up airfares and some other costs, hasn’t so far led to broad-based, sustained inflation, economists said.

    “This reading is very much in the camp that the inflation we’ve had this year is transitory,” said Michael Metcalfe, head of macro strategy at State Street Markets. “Yes, gas prices went up, but nothing else did, more or less.”

    Benign report could make Fed rate hike less likely

    Tuesday’s report likely reduces pressure on the Fed to boost its short-term interest rate to combat inflation. Last month, Fed officials left their key rate unchanged at about 3.6 per cent.

    “Today’s report gave some breathing room for the Federal Reserve in deciding whether and when to raise interest rates,” Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Financial, said.

    Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, in written testimony to the House Financial Services Committee, said Tuesday that the Fed has “no tolerance” for high inflation which he pledged would become “a thing of the past.” Yet he provided no hints about what steps the Fed may take in coming months. Warsh will face questions later Tuesday from members of Congress.

    More goods and services saw slower price gains than expected

    A wider range of prices cooled last month than economists had forecast. Electricity prices, which have been elevated by spiking demand from data centres, fell 1 per cent from May to June, though they are still 4-per-cent higher than a year ago. Clothing prices dropped 0.6 per cent from May to June but are 3.9 per cent more expensive than a year earlier.

    Groceries rose 0.2 per cent from May to June and are up 2.7 per cent from last year, while apartment rental costs cooled, rising just 0.1 per cent last month and 2.8 per cent from a year ago.

    The inflation-fighters at the Fed remain sharply divided over next steps, according to minutes of their June 16-17 meeting. About half of policy-makers support raising interest rates by the end of the year to cool borrowing, spending, and price increases, the minutes showed. Another half are willing to wait for signs that inflation may resume falling as gas prices decline, though the minutes predate the recent flare-up of violence in the Middle East.

    And the situation in the Middle East continues to change hour to hour. On Tuesday, the price for a barrel of Brent crude oil, the international standard, climbed 4.6 per cent to US$87.13 after the United States and Iran each said the Strait of Hormuz is under its control. Gas prices have also risen about 6 US cents a gallon in the past week, to a nationwide average of US$3.86 a gallon.

    “Today’s number is a very good reading, but so much is going to depend on what happens in the Middle East,” Bostjancic said.

    Next steps

    Many Fed officials have flagged massive investments in the build out of artificial intelligence infrastructure as a factor that could worsen inflation by pushing up prices for memory chips and other semiconductors, as well as electricity. With chips so much more expensive, companies like Apple AAPL-Q -0.77%decrease, Microsoft MSFT-Q -1.55%decrease, and Dell DELL-N +7.12%increase have announced price increases for laptops, tablets, and video game consoles.

    Other Fed officials have offered conflicting views on what steps the Fed could take next. On Monday, Fed governor Christopher Waller said he was worried about core inflation, which he noted had risen from 3 per cent last December to 3.4 per cent in May, according to the Fed’s preferred measure. He pointed out that the cost of more than two-thirds of services have risen by 3 per cent or more compared with a year ago.

    “If we get another hot reading on core inflation this week, then the (Fed) will need to consider tightening monetary policy in the near term,” Waller said in a speech in New York.

    But last week John Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said that if core inflation stays at a 0.2-per-cent monthly pace for the rest of this year, the Fed could avoid hiking rates. Tuesday’s data is along the lines of what Williams wants to see.

    Other signs of where prices are headed are mixed. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said last week that a survey found that nearly half the companies in its region that have paid tariffs still plan to lift their prices further.

    Separately, Walmart last week said it was rolling back prices on thousands of items, including ground beef, potato chips, toys, and clothes. President Donald Trump praised the move on social media and sought to take credit for the reduction, though the company did not mention Trump in its announcement.

  • Jul 13 20262:59 PM EDT

    Stocks drop after Trump reimposes Strait of Hormuz blockade, SK Hynix leads chip stocks lower: Live updates

    Stocks fell on Monday after President Donald Trump announced he was reinstating what he called a blockade on Iranian shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

    The S&P 500 lost 0.7%, while the Nasdaq Composite was down 1.5%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average traded down 139 points, or 0.3%.

    “We are reinstating the THE IRANIAN BLOCKADE, so named because it is only stopping Iran’s ships or customers from entering or leaving,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

    “The U.S.A. will be, from this point forward, known as ‘THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT,’ but as such, and as a matter of FAIRNESS, will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped, for any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security to this very volatile section of the World,” he continued.

    Oil prices jumped following his announcement, with U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures rising more than 7% to top $76. Brent crude futures, the international benchmark, advanced 7% to above $81 per barrel.

    The latest escalation came after Iran and the U.S. exchanged airstrikes over the weekend. Tehran targeted U.S. facilities in several Gulf countries and declared the Strait of Hormuz closed, though Trump disputed that claim on Sunday, saying the key shipping lane remained open to commercial traffic.

    Trump on Saturday ordered airstrikes on Iran after Tehran attacked a commercial vessel transiting the strait.

    “It’s a range-bound market until you get a true solution in the Middle East,” said Ben Fulton, CEO of WEBs Investments.

    Semiconductor names were under pressure. U.S.-listed shares of SK Hynix lost 6% following the South Korean chipmaker’s Nasdaq debut on Friday, when it soared 13%.

    Shares in Micron Technology were down 5%, while shares of Sandisk shed 12%. Seagate Technology fell 6%. Elsewhere, Advanced Micro Devices was 3% lower, while Intel pulled back 6%.

    “I feel like some of the shift has gotten ahead of itself,” Fulton also said, adding that he still thinks the AI trade is ultimately “alive and well.”

    Additionally, shares of major U.S. banks — namely, JPMorgan ChaseGoldman SachsMorgan StanleyBank of AmericaCitigroup and Wells Fargo — were lower ahead of their earnings results this week. Quarterly results from NetflixJohnson & Johnson and UnitedHealth are also on deck.

    Expectations for the season are high. On average, analysts estimate that second-quarter S&P 500 profits grew by more than 23% year over year, per FactSet.

    On Tuesday, the June CPI report is due out in the morning. Economists polled by Dow Jones are expecting the headline reading to show a 0.2% decline on the month but a year-over-year increase of 3.8%.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh is also slated to appear before the House Financial Services Committee Tuesday, offering testimony on the central bank’s semi-annual monetary policy report.

    — CNBC’s Yun Li contributed reporting.

  • TSX Event Watch — July 13:

    (1) Oil, yields and technology under pressure

    Executive summary

    • Confirmed: Brent crude was up about 3.1% at US$78.40 and WTI about 3.0% at US$73.58 after renewed U.S.–Iran strikes.
    • Confirmed: Iran claimed the Strait of Hormuz was closed, while U.S. authorities said commercial traffic was still moving; roughly 20 vessels reportedly passed through during the prior 24 hours.
    • Confirmed: Nasdaq futures were down about 0.9%, while the U.S. 2-year Treasury yield rose to roughly 4.24%, its highest level since early 2025.
    • Interpretation: The immediate TSX effect is likely positive for energy but negative for technology, utilities, REITs and consumer-sensitive sectors because higher oil and bond yields revive inflation concerns.

    Sector impact

    Energy: Positive. Higher crude prices improve near-term cash-flow expectations for producers such as CNQ, Suncor, Cenovus and Imperial Oil.

    Financials: Mixed. Higher yields can support net interest margins, but geopolitical risk and slower-growth concerns can raise credit-risk expectations.

    Materials: Mixed. Higher geopolitical risk can support safe-haven demand, but rising yields are pressuring gold; industrial metals remain more dependent on China’s July 15 data.

    Technology: Negative. Higher bond yields compress valuation multiples, and global semiconductor and AI shares were weaker in pre-market trading.

    Utilities and REITs: Negative. Both are bond-proxy sectors and are vulnerable to rising long-term yields.

    Industrials: Slightly negative. Higher fuel and transportation costs are an earnings headwind, although defence-related companies may outperform.

    Consumer sectors: Negative. Higher gasoline and transportation costs reduce household purchasing power and raise operating costs.

    TSX interpretation

    The TSX could outperform U.S. technology-heavy indexes because of its energy weighting, but the broad index may still struggle if oil-driven inflation pushes yields higher. The key near-term test is whether the Strait remains operational despite competing claims. A verified reduction in vessel traffic would strengthen the bullish energy and bearish rate-sensitive-sector thesis; normalized shipping would weaken it.

    (2) Material development identified:

    Confirmed facts
    • Brent crude rose about 3.3% to US$78.48 per barrel and WTI rose about 3.3% to US$73.76 on July 13 after renewed U.S.–Iran military strikes increased concern about shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
    • September S&P/TSX futures were up about 0.1% early Monday.
    • Iran says the Strait is closed, while U.S. Central Command says about 20 vessels passed through in the previous 24 hours. A full closure is therefore not independently confirmed.
    • A Reuters poll published July 13 found all 36 economists expect the Bank of Canada to hold its policy rate at 2.25% on July 15.

    Likely TSX impact
    • Energy: positive from higher oil prices.
    • Financials: mixed; higher yields may help margins, but geopolitical risk can weaken credit sentiment.
    • Materials: neutral to slightly negative if China growth concerns outweigh inflation-hedge demand.
    • Technology: negative bias if higher oil lifts inflation expectations and bond yields.
    • Utilities and REITs: negative bias from higher yields.
    • Industrials: mixed; transport and manufacturing face higher fuel and input costs.
    • Consumer sectors: negative because higher energy costs reduce household purchasing power.

    Interpretation
    The immediate benefit is concentrated in energy. The broad TSX response may remain limited because higher oil also raises inflation, interest-rate and growth risks.

    Base case: energy outperforms while the overall TSX is only modestly higher.
    Bull case: shipping normalizes and tensions ease, allowing broader sectors to recover.
    Bear case: verified disruption pushes crude materially higher, but the broad TSX weakens on inflation and recession concerns.

    (3) Oil and Hormuz Escalation | July 13, 2026

    Summary

    • Iran has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed following renewed U.S.–Iran military exchanges, although U.S. Central Command says commercial traffic is still moving and about 20 ships passed in the prior 24 hours.
    • WTI crude was approximately US$73.75–US$73.99 early Monday, up roughly 2.4%–3.5%; Brent was about US$78.22–US$78.76, up around 3%–3.6%.
    • September S&P/TSX futures were up only about 0.1% at 6:12 a.m. ET, indicating that energy-sector support was being partly offset by weaker global risk sentiment and higher bond yields.
    • Nasdaq futures were down about 0.9%, while the U.S. 2-year Treasury yield reached roughly 4.24%, reflecting renewed inflation concerns from higher oil prices.
    • The Bank of Canada is still widely expected to hold its policy rate at 2.25% on July 15; the main focus will be its inflation language and updated forecasts.

    Confirmed Developments

    1. Strait of Hormuz risk increased materially
      Iran says the waterway is closed, but actual shipping has not stopped completely. The discrepancy matters: a verified physical shutdown would be materially more serious than a political declaration alone.
    2. Oil prices moved sharply higher
      WTI rose into the US$73.75–US$73.99 range and Brent into the US$78.22–US$78.76 range. This is a meaningful but not yet disorderly price shock.
    3. Broader markets turned risk-off
      U.S. equity futures weakened, especially technology, while short-term Treasury yields rose. TSX futures remained slightly positive because Canada’s large energy weight offset part of the global equity weakness.

    Likely TSX Impact

    Energy: Positive near term. CNQ, Suncor, Cenovus and Imperial Oil should receive direct support from higher crude prices.

    Financials: Mixed. Higher yields may support margins, but a larger geopolitical shock would increase credit and recession risk.

    Materials: Mixed to negative. Higher yields and a stronger inflation premium can pressure gold and growth-sensitive metals, despite safe-haven demand.

    Technology: Negative near term. Higher yields reduce valuation support for long-duration growth stocks such as Shopify and Constellation Software.

    Utilities and REITs: Negative. Rising bond yields increase discount rates and borrowing-cost concerns.

    Industrials: Mixed to negative. Railways and exporters face risk-off pressure, while defence-related names may benefit.

    Consumer sectors: Negative overall. Higher fuel costs pressure household spending, airlines, transportation and discretionary margins.

    Interpretation

    The TSX may outperform U.S. indexes today because of its energy weighting, but the index-level gain could remain modest if technology, utilities, REITs and consumer shares weaken. The key confirmation signal is whether tanker traffic actually declines further and whether WTI sustains a move above the mid-US$70s.

    What Would Disprove This View

    • Verified normalization of commercial shipping through Hormuz.
    • A credible U.S.–Iran de-escalation agreement.
    • WTI reversing below approximately US$71–US$72.
    • Bond yields falling despite higher oil prices.

    Sources: Reuters, Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch and U.S. Central Command reporting, July 13, 2026.

  • Study says 40% of Canadian businesses looking to relocate to U.S.

    new study by KPMG found that 40% or manufacturers in Canada have moved production south of the border or are considering the idea as they adapt to trade uncertainty and competitive pressure.

    “Manufacturers have shown incredible resilience, adapting to tariffs and uncertainty to navigate this period of heightened volatility,” said Anamika Gadia, Partner and National Leader of Industrial Markets at KPMG Canada.

    “But businesses can only operate in endurance mode for so long. Companies can delay investments, absorb higher costs and adjust their operations, but they can’t remain in a holding pattern indefinitely. At some point, uncertainty begins to shape long-term decisions about where investment, production and growth will occur.”

    Some of the top reasons for the exodus to the U.S. include avoiding or reducing high import tariffs, ongoing trade uncertainty, lower operating costs and a more favourable tax environment.

    Those same companies were asked what would encourage them to stay in Canada. The respondents said ensuring certainty around free trade, continuing tariff relief and remissions for imports from the U.S., lowering corporate taxes, improving cost of living and housing affordability for employees, and improved access to skilled workers could help change their plans.

    On Canada Day, the Trump administration said the U.S. would not join Canada and Mexico in extending the free trade deal for another 16 years. The agreement remains in effect for 10 years while the three sides either negotiate changes or decide to withdraw from the pact.

    Heavily dependent

    The survey says that Canadian manufacturers remain heavily dependent on the U.S. market, with 61% agreeing their business cannot survive without access to it. Eighty-six per cent of manufacturers export goods outside Canada, and among exporters, 96% say their products are CUSMA-compliant, meaning they are not subject to tariffs.

    “While tariffs are an obvious factor, Canadian manufacturers are making long-term decisions about where to locate based on a broader assessment of where they are most likely to have a competitive advantage,” says Joy Nott, Partner, Trade and Customs at KPMG Canada.

    A survey of 275 manufacturers finds that 57% say they have paused, reduced or cancelled capital expenditure projects due to economic uncertainty, trade and tariff threats, while 42% have scaled back or paused research and development spending. Fifty-two per cent say they are currently operating in “endurance mode.”

    “Sustaining Canada’s manufacturing sector will require businesses to continue investing in productivity, technology and market diversification, while governments work to reduce uncertainty and improve competitiveness,” Gadia said. “The question now is whether Canada can create the conditions that give manufacturers the confidence to keep building, investing and staying here.”

    The study also noted that 80% of Canadian manufacturers plan to keep their headquarters in Canada. However, 11% plan to move their headquarters to the U.S. within the next five years.

    “The greater risk isn’t where companies are today, but where future investment decisions are being made,” Gadia said. “Many manufacturers are pausing Canadian investments and reassessing where future growth and production capacity should be located.”

    Study: 40% of Canadian businesses looking to relocate to US | Toronto Sun

  • Canada’s labour market enters ‘new phase’ of near-zero job growth

    Job growth in Canada could almost flatline and it still wouldn’t affect the national unemployment rate because of population declines, though the story differs on a province-by-province basis, says Toronto-Dominion Bank.

    “Canada’s job market is entering a new phase,” Marc Ercolao, an economist at TD, said in report on July 8, two days before the June Labour Force Survey is released by Statistics Canada.

    TD estimated that to hold the national unemployment rate steady — “breakeven employment growth” — the number of new jobs needed on a monthly basis is close to zero since federal immigration cuts have reduced Canada’s population over the past few quarters for the first time on record.

    However, Ercolao said a national near-zero growth rate “masks” major differences from province to province.

    “In some provinces, labour forces are already shrinking,” he said. “In others, migration and younger demographics continue to expand the pool of available workers.”

    For example, the amount of hiring needed to hold unemployment rates steady in OntarioBritish Columbia and Quebec has “sharply” fallen, with Ercolao estimating that those provinces could lose 11,000, 13,000 and 36,000 positions, respectively, without triggering a higher jobless rate.

    “This marks a sharp reversal from their historical pattern of steady job growth,” he said.

    He said the decline in population growth in the three provinces is the main reason for the change. He also expects the provinces’ workforces to shrink this year because of the loss of younger working-age temporary immigrants.

    Meanwhile, Alberta will need to add 56,000 positions this year to keep a lid on the unemployment rate, TD said, because the province continues to record the highest rate of people moving there from other parts of Canada, while a younger population implies that the workforce will continue to grow.

    “Alberta’s breakeven threshold is meaningfully higher,” Ercolao said. “That limits how far its unemployment rate can fall, even with solid hiring.”

    Several other provinces, including Saskatchewan and Manitoba, are forecasted to add jobs above their breakeven points recorded prior to the pandemic.

    The Prairie workforce is expected to expand nearly two per cent in 2026 and Atlantic Canada’s could grow almost one per cent compared against “national stagnation,” TD said.

    Newfoundland and Labrador is expected to mirror its historical pace of job growth, recording a flat breakeven, TD said.

    “As labour force growth stalls, national employment reports are becoming harder to interpret,” Ercolao said, adding that the Bank of Canada has already cautioned that labour force data needs to be interpreted with care.Advertisement 2

    Statistics Canada releases June’s job numbers on July 10 and analysts are calling for the unemployment rate to hold steady at 6.6 per cent and for the economy to add 10,000 positions.

    In May, Canada added 87,800 net new positions, blowing past economist estimates.

  • TSX Watchlist: July 13–17, 2026

    Summary

    • Wednesday, July 15 is the highest-risk session: the Bank of Canada rate decision, Monetary Policy Report, China’s economic data and U.S. producer inflation are all scheduled.
    • U.S. CPI on Tuesday will influence bond yields, Federal Reserve expectations and TSX technology, utilities, REITs and financials.
    • Strait of Hormuz developments remain the main geopolitical risk. Escalation would likely support Canadian energy shares but hurt airlines, consumer stocks and interest-rate-sensitive sectors.
    • China’s Q2 GDP and June activity data will be important for TSX materials, mining and commodity producers.
    • U.S. bank and technology earnings could affect global risk appetite and spill over into Canadian financial and technology stocks.

    Event Calendar and Expected TSX Impact

    DateEventMain TSX exposurePotential market effect
    Mon., July 13Outcome of U.S.–Iran/Oman talks; Fed speakersEnergy, airlines, industrialsOil and risk-sentiment volatility
    Tue., July 14U.S. June CPI; Fed Chair congressional testimonyTechnology, REITs, utilities, banksMajor bond-yield and valuation catalyst
    Wed., July 15Bank of Canada decision and Monetary Policy ReportBanks, REITs, utilities, telecoms, CADLargest domestic catalyst
    Wed., July 15China Q2 GDP, industrial production and retail salesMaterials, mining, energyCommodity-demand signal
    Wed., July 15U.S. June PPI; Fed Beige BookTechnology, financials, industrialsInflation and growth expectations
    Wed., July 15Canadian manufacturing and wholesale salesIndustrials, transports, banksDomestic growth indication
    Thu., July 16U.S. retail sales and jobless claimsConsumer, financials, technologyU.S. demand and rate outlook
    Fri., July 17U.S. industrial production, housing starts, consumer sentiment and import pricesMaterials, industrials, financialsGrowth and inflation confirmation
    Fri., July 17Canadian foreign securities transactionsCAD, banks, broad TSXCapital-flow signal

    Key Drivers

    1. Bank of Canada decision — Wednesday, July 15

    The Bank of Canada will announce its policy rate at 9:45 a.m. ET and publish a new Monetary Policy Report. The overnight rate is currently 2.25%, and the consensus expectation is for no change.

    The rate decision itself may therefore be less important than the Bank’s language on:

    • May’s elevated inflation;
    • energy-price volatility;
    • economic recovery;
    • U.S. trade uncertainty;
    • the future balance between rate cuts and rate increases.

    TSX reaction framework

    Bank of Canada messageLikely sector reaction
    Dovish: inflation expected to ease; weak growth emphasizedPositive for REITs, utilities, telecoms and growth stocks; CAD may weaken
    Neutral: rate unchanged with balanced risksLimited index reaction; sector-specific trading
    Hawkish: energy inflation and inflation expectations emphasizedBond yields and CAD could rise; negative for REITs, utilities and technology; mixed for banks

    The latest economist polling indicates the Bank is widely expected to hold rates steady through much of 2026, but an unexpected hawkish tone could still generate significant volatility.


    2. U.S. CPI — Tuesday, July 14

    The U.S. June CPI report is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. ET.

    Headline inflation may decline because gasoline prices dropped after the earlier easing in U.S.–Iran tensions. However, core inflation is more important because it excludes food and energy and better reflects underlying price pressure.

    TSX implications

    Lower-than-expected core CPI

    • U.S. and Canadian bond yields could fall.
    • Positive for Shopify, Constellation Software and other high-duration technology shares.
    • Positive for utilities, telecoms and REITs.
    • Potentially negative for bank net-interest-margin expectations.

    Higher-than-expected core CPI

    • Bond yields could rise.
    • Technology and rate-sensitive sectors could weaken.
    • Banks may initially benefit from higher-rate expectations, although recession concerns could offset that benefit.
    • The U.S. dollar could strengthen, potentially weakening the Canadian dollar.

    The key distinction is between lower headline inflation caused by gasoline and genuine improvement in core inflation.


    3. Strait of Hormuz and U.S.–Iran tensions

    This remains the largest unscheduled risk.

    WTI ended the previous week near US$71.41 per barrel, supported by renewed U.S.–Iran conflict, attacks on shipping and higher maritime insurance costs. Commercial traffic through the Strait remained constrained despite continued negotiations.

    The United States has demanded that Iran publicly commit to safe commercial passage through the Strait. Discussions involving Iran and Oman therefore have the potential to materially move oil when markets reopen.

    TSX impact

    DevelopmentLikely TSX effect
    Iran agrees to secure passage; tanker traffic normalizesOil falls; energy stocks weaken; airlines and consumer stocks benefit
    Negotiations continue without resolutionOil remains volatile around an elevated risk premium
    Additional tanker attacks or military strikesOil rises; CNQ, Suncor, Imperial Oil and Cenovus likely outperform
    Full disruption of Hormuz trafficStrong energy rally, but broader TSX could weaken due to inflation and recession concerns

    A rise in oil is not automatically positive for the whole TSX. Energy may rise while technology, consumer discretionary, transportation, utilities and REITs decline because of higher inflation and bond yields.


    4. China economic data — Wednesday, July 15

    China is scheduled to publish:

    • second-quarter GDP;
    • June industrial production;
    • retail sales;
    • fixed-asset investment;
    • housing-market data.

    China’s official statistical release calendar confirms that quarterly economic performance data are released in July.

    TSX exposure

    China is an important marginal buyer of industrial commodities. Results will therefore affect:

    • copper producers;
    • diversified miners;
    • steel and metallurgical coal;
    • fertilizer producers;
    • oil-demand expectations.

    Stronger data: supportive for materials and energy, particularly copper-sensitive companies.

    Weaker data: negative for mining and commodity prices, although expectations of Chinese stimulus could partially offset the initial decline.

    The most important figures for the TSX may be industrial production, fixed investment and property activity, rather than headline GDP alone.


    5. U.S. PPI and Canadian activity data — Wednesday

    The U.S. Producer Price Index is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. ET on July 15.

    PPI measures inflation at the producer level and can indicate future pressure on consumer prices and corporate margins.

    On the same morning, Canada will release May manufacturing shipments and wholesale trade data.

    TSX impact

    • Strong Canadian manufacturing data would support the domestic-growth outlook and industrial stocks.
    • Weak data would reinforce concerns about tariffs, exports and business investment.
    • High U.S. PPI could raise bond yields and pressure rate-sensitive TSX sectors.
    • Low PPI would support the argument that inflation is moderating.

    6. U.S. retail sales — Thursday, July 16

    U.S. retail sales are important because the United States is Canada’s largest export market.

    Strong retail sales

    • Positive for Canadian manufacturers and exporters.
    • Supportive for railways and industrials.
    • Could raise yields if markets interpret the data as reducing the need for Fed easing.

    Weak retail sales

    • Negative for Canadian cyclicals and exporters.
    • Potentially positive for technology and REIT valuations if bond yields fall.
    • Could increase recession concerns if weakness is broad.

    The TSX reaction will depend on whether the market prioritizes growth or interest-rate relief.


    7. U.S. bank and technology earnings

    Major U.S. financial institutions—including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley—are scheduled to report during the week. Semiconductor equipment producer ASML and chip manufacturer TSMC are also major global catalysts.

    Canadian spillovers

    U.S. bank results

    Watch for:

    • loan-loss provisions;
    • credit-card delinquencies;
    • commercial-real-estate exposure;
    • investment-banking revenue;
    • net interest margins.

    Poor credit-quality commentary could pressure Royal Bank, TD, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank even without Canadian-specific news.

    Semiconductor results

    Strong AI demand and capital-spending guidance could support:

    • Shopify through broader technology sentiment;
    • Celestica through data-centre and hardware demand;
    • the overall TTTK technology index.

    Weak semiconductor orders or cautious guidance could reverse recent technology-sector strength.


    Risk Ranking

    RankCatalystTSX sensitivity
    1Bank of Canada decision and Monetary Policy ReportVery high
    2U.S.–Iran/Hormuz developmentsVery high
    3U.S. CPIVery high
    4China GDP and industrial dataHigh
    5U.S. PPI and retail salesModerate–high
    6U.S. earnings seasonModerate–high
    7Canadian manufacturing and wholesale dataModerate

    Scenarios for the Week

    ScenarioConditionsProbable TSX effect
    BullBoC remains neutral/dovish; U.S. core inflation softens; China data are firm; Hormuz tensions ease without an oil collapseBroad TSX advance led by technology, financials and materials
    BaseBoC holds with balanced language; inflation data are mixed; oil remains near its current rangeRange-bound TSX with significant sector rotation
    BearBoC turns hawkish; U.S. core inflation surprises higher; China disappoints; Hormuz conflict escalatesEnergy may outperform, but broad TSX pressured by higher yields and weaker risk appetite

    Actionable Takeaways

    • Wednesday is the pivotal day because Canadian monetary policy, China’s growth data and U.S. producer inflation arrive within hours of each other.
    • For energy, monitor tanker traffic and official statements from Iran, Oman and the United States—not merely headlines about negotiations.
    • For technology, utilities and REITs, the key variable is the direction of North American bond yields following CPI and the Bank of Canada decision.
    • For materials, China’s industrial and property data will be more important than Canadian domestic releases.
    • For financials, watch both the Bank of Canada’s rate outlook and credit-quality commentary from U.S. bank earnings.
    • The base case is a volatile, sector-rotation-driven week, rather than a uniform rise or decline across the TSX.