FIRST-QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS
- Consolidated comparable sales were up 4.7% and consolidated retail sales1 were up 5.1%. Increased trips drove sales growth across all banners, with particular strength in Ontario, Quebec and Eastern Canada.
- Canadian Tire Retail (CTR) comparable sales1 grew 4.7%, with growth across all CTR divisions except Fixing, led by strong growth in seasonal weather-related categories. Auto maintenance, outdoor tools, and auto parts were the top-performing lines of business in the quarter.
- SportChek delivered a third consecutive quarter of comparable sales1 growth, up 6.3%, driven by strong sales across both corporate and franchise stores. Skiing and snowboards, hockey, and outerwear were the top performing categories in the quarter.
- Mark’s comparable sales1 were up 2.2%, driven by industrial wear. New store openings continued to be the most significant contributor to retail sales growth and advances in in-store Net Promoter Score (NPS).
- Backed by the strength of the Canadian Tire brand and Triangle member engagement, loyalty sales growth outperformed retail sales. Loyalty penetration1 was up 132 bps, reaching 54.5% of retail sales on a direct scan, rolling 12-month basis.
- Consolidated income before income taxes (IBT) was down $51.3 million to $51.6 million and Diluted EPS was $0.67, including the results for Helly Hansen business (now included in discontinued operations) and expenses related to the implementation of the Company’s True North strategy.
- Normalized for the True North expenses, IBT1 on a continuing operations basis was up $62.8 million to $165.7 million, which resulted in Normalized Diluted EPS (continuing operations) of $2.00, up $0.92 from last year. Improved IBT was mainly due to an increase in retail segment profitability.
- Normalized Retail IBT1 on a continuing operations basis was $50.9 million, up $69.2 million, due to higher gross margin and lower interest expense.
- Financial Services IBT was $97.0 million, up $1.3 million, as higher revenue offset expected increases in net impairment losses, as well as higher funding costs.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.