Author: Consultant

  • Canadian market share of U.S.-made vehicles tumbles 20% in first half of 2026

    The Canadian market share of U.S.-made vehicles fell by 20 per cent in the first half of 2026 from a year earlier, as the trade war pushed automakers to shift supply lines or halt exports to Canada.

    Cars and trucks made in the United States face retaliatory tariffs of 25 per cent on U.S. content, a measure Ottawa took in response to U.S. tariffs worth the same amount.

    In response to the Canadian tariffs, Volvo, Tesla, Subaru and Mazda have stopped exports of certain U.S.-made models to Canada, or shifted production to other countries in order to avoid the Canadian tariffs. Cars made in Mexico, Japan and South Korea enter Canada free of tariffs.

    The JD Power figures show Mexican-made cars’ market share rose by 22 per cent to hold 22.2 per cent of sales in the first half of 2026, compared with the year-ago period. Japanese cars’ share increased 21 per cent to command 16.6 per cent of the market, while South Korea’s share increased by more than 7 per cent to 15.6 per cent.

    Canadian-made vehicles saw their market share fall by 9 per cent to 11.5 per cent.

    Prosperity’s Path: Canada’s auto sector is marked for death. What now?

    U.S.-made vehicles retained the largest share of the Canadian market in the first half of the year, with 28.4 per cent. This is down from 35.4 per cent in the first half of 2025, JD Power said.

    “Our data shows the largest change for vehicles coming out of the U.S.,” said Robert Karwel, director of OEM Solutions with JD Power in Canada.

    Brian Kingston, head of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association (CVMA), which represents the Detroit Three automakers in Canada, said the share of U.S. vehicles in Canada was 43 per cent as recently as 2024. He said U.S. government data that show declines in U.S. auto production and employment underline the impact of U.S. protectionism.

    “U.S. trade policy is damaging the U.S. automotive industry, and virtually every metric supports that,” Mr. Kingston said.

    Tariffs are “not a policy that is strengthening the U.S. automotive industry,” Mr. Kingston said. “It’s obviously hurting Canada, it’s obviously hurting Mexico, but overall it is weakening North America’s industry at a time where we have Chinese exports growing all over the world.”

    Canada remains the largest market for U.S.-made vehicles – larger than Germany, China, Mexico and South Korea combined, according to the CVMA. Many of the U.S.-made vehicles are bigger SUVs and pickups for which there is little demand in places outside Canada and the U.S., said Lucas Malinowski, head of Global Automakers of Canada, which represents overseas brands.

    “It is a perverse outcome of this whole trade war, right?” he said. “It’s hurting Canadian auto manufacturing, but it’s also hurting U.S. auto manufacturing.”

    Andrew King, managing partner of DesRosiers Automotive Consultants, confirmed imports from the U.S. have slipped this year.

    Auto tariffs of 15% would erase profitability and spur industry’s decline, experts say

    “It is likely more based on sourcing changes to avoid tariffs than consumer demand,” Mr. King said. “A number of vehicle companies have changed their sourcing of U.S. vehicles to avoid the Canadian countertariffs – Tesla being the leading example – it is now bringing in vehicles to Canada from Germany and China rather than from the U.S. This was done primarily to avoid the 25-per-cent countertariff. A number of other manufacturers have done the same thing – which has changed sourcing patterns notably.”

    DesRosiers’ data show Canadians bought 950,000 cars in the first half, down by 2.6 per cent from the same period of 2025.

    Mazda Canada spokeswoman Sandra Lemaitre said the Huntsville, Ala.-made Mazda CX-50 is no longer available in Canada because of the tariffs.

    Volvo makes the EX90 in Charleston, S.C., but stopped shipping the electric SUV to Canada because of the tariffs, said company spokeswoman Jennifer Okoeguale. The company is considering bringing in the smaller, Chinese-made EX30 under Canada’s agreement to allow 49,000 electricvehicles from China, Ms. Okoeguale said.

    After a one-year halt, Nissan recently resumed shipping to Canada the models made in Tennessee and Mississippi: Pathfinder, Murano and Frontier, and Infiniti QX60 and QX65.

    Nissan cars made in Mexico and Japan account for more than 80 per cent of its Canadian sales, a share that is unchanged since before tariffs, said Didier Marsaud, a company spokesman.

    Opinion: As Geely announces plans, Chinese EV brands could destroy Canada’s auto sector – or help save it

    U.S. tariffs on vehicles made in Europe have eliminated a Stellantis car from Canadian dealerships. The automaker ceased production of the Dodge Hornet, made in Italy and exported to North America, after the U.S. imposed 25-per-cent tariffs, said Lou Ann Gosselin, a spokeswoman for Stellantis.

    Ottawa’s tariffs on U.S.-made cars, announced last year, include a confidential carve-out for companies that have an investment or production footprint in Canada. This allows the five companies that make cars in Ontario – Ford, General Motors, Stellantis, Honda and Toyota – to import U.S. cars tariff-free. However, the federal government has said recent job or production cuts by Stellantis and GM have led to a reduction in tariff remissions for those companies.

    The U.S. tariffs, imposed by President Donald Trump, are a violation of the North American free-trade deal he signed in his first term.

    According to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, the U.S. has collected US$50-billion in tariffs on autos and parts since 2025. This includes US$7-billion on Canadian-made vehicles, Mr. Kingston said.

  • Wholesale prices jumped 6.3% annually in September, biggest gain since 2022

    September producer prices were expected to increase 0.6% month-over-month and 5.5% annually, according to the consensus estimate of economists polled by Dow Jones.

    September retail sales were estimated to increase by 0.4% from the prior month, according to the Dow Jones Survey.

  • Nvidia, AMD, Micron fall as AI stock sell-off deepens

     Points

    • Nvidia, Micron and AMD dropped in premarket trading on Thursday, as AI stocks across the globe continued a plummet.
    • 20 of the most valuable global AI and semiconductor stocks have shed more than $1 trillion so far this week.
    • The declines came as investors grew increasingly concerned that higher borrowing costs could weigh on the massive capital spending

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/sk-hynix-samsung-softbank-stocks-asia-tech-rout-ai-funding-worries.html

  • Memory stocks are getting hammered. China and a 2029 oversupply are the big worries

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/memory-stocks-micron-sk-hynix-samsung-china.html

    summary

    • China’s CXMT reportedly announced progress on a denser memory-chip design and plans for a server-memory product by year-end 2026. This raised competitive concerns for Micron, SK Hynix and Samsung. ua.news
    • The key uncertainty is commercial execution: manufacturing yields, production volumes and cost competitiveness remain unproven. investopedia.com
    • The sell-off also coincides with broader concerns about inflation, interest rates and AI investment spending. Attributing the entire decline to China would be misleading. wsj.com

    Key drivers and implications

    My interpretation: Investors are reassessing how long today’s favourable industry conditions can last. Strong demand does not automatically protect profits if competitors increase supply faster.

    DriverPotential earnings effectEvidence to monitor
    Additional Chinese supplyGreater price competition and weaker marginsActual shipments and customer adoption
    Continued AI investmentSupports memory demandCustomer orders and spending commitments
    Higher production spendingCan reduce free cash flow despite revenue growthCapital expenditure relative to operating cash flow
    Higher interest ratesCan reduce the valuation investors assign to future earningsBond yields and valuation multiples

    The distinction between a technical announcement and profitable mass production matters. An announcement can move share prices immediately; the operating impact depends on whether the product can be manufactured reliably, economically and at scale.

    Valuation logic

    A falling share price does not necessarily mean a cheaper business if expected earnings are falling too.

    Illustrative example—not a company forecast:

    MeasureBeforeAfter
    Share price$100$80
    Expected annual earnings per share$10$6
    Forward P/E10.0×13.3×

    The shares fall 20%, but the earnings multiple rises because expected earnings fall 40%. For cyclical manufacturers, sustainable earnings and cash flow matter more than a low P/E based on unusually strong profits.

    Scenarios and risks

    ScenarioConditionsImplication
    BullCXMT’s commercial rollout disappoints; demand remains strongPricing and profits prove resilient
    BaseChinese supply expands gradually alongside demandGrowth continues, but pricing power moderates
    BearSupply accelerates while AI investment slowsPrices, margins and earnings expectations weaken together

    These are conditional scenarios, not probability-weighted forecasts.

    Actionable takeaways

    The most useful indicators are memory selling prices, inventories, gross-margin guidance, customer commitments and free cash flow.

    The bearish thesis would weaken if incumbents maintain pricing and margins despite Chinese expansion. The bullish thesis would weaken if inventories rise and earnings guidance falls despite continued AI demand.

  • Consumer prices rose 3.7% annually in September as gas prices skyrocket


    • The consumer price index showed annual inflation of 3.7% in September after rising 0.6% for the month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday.
    • The Core CPI, which strips out food and energy, posted an annual reading of 2.6% after climbing 0.3%.
    • Energy prices were a major factor again as gasoline rose 9.1% and accounted for half the increase in the index.
    • However, price pressures were broad-based, with gains in shelter, vehicle costs and apparel.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/14/cpi-inflation-report-september-2026.html

  • Producer prices in China rise at fastest pace since June 2022, beating expectations

    • China’s PPI rose 5% year on year in September, sharply up from August’s 3.8% and beating the 4.5% rise expected.
    • CPI rose 0.9%, up from 0.8% in August, but missing the 1% expected by economists.

    China’s producer price index climbed at its fastest pace in over four years, rising 5% in September as higher fuel prices pushed up costs for businesses.

    The increase was higher than the 4.5% expected by economists polled by Reuters, and sharply up from the 3.8% seen in the previous month.

    China’s National Bureau of Statistics said higher prices were also seen in the country’s coal sector, due to increased demand for coal for winter heating, temporary tight supply in major coal-producing areas, and expectations of rising international coal prices.

    Consumer prices saw a 0.9% rise, marginally missing expectations of 1%, but up from 0.8% in the month before.

    The increase in the consumer inflation rate was due to gasoline prices, which climbed 16.6% and contributed approximately 0.47 percentage points to the year-on-year CPI increase, according to Dong Lijuan, chief statistician of the Urban Division at the NBS.

    This was partially offset by a wider fall in food prices, which declined 1.7% and pulled down the CPI by 0.29 percentage points, Dong added.

    The core CPI rate, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, climbed 1%.

    The higher inflation figures come as China’s economy grapples with its lowest growth rate in more than three years. GDP growth for the second quarter of the year missed expectations at 4.3%.

    While economic data for August showed that retail sales expanded more slowly than expected, industrial output beat expectations.

    On Sept 28, a State Council readout signaled that more policy support could be on the way for the Chinese economy, saying that “In response to emerging challenges in the economy’s operation, efforts should be made to intensify counter-cyclical adjustment of macro policies.”

    Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING, wrote that “It marks a bit of a shift in tone,” adding that more policy support rollouts will be coming so as to reach both short- and long-term growth targets.

    “These include the 4.5%-5.0% GDP growth target for 2026, and the longstanding goal to double GDP from 2020 to 2035.”

    — This is breaking news, please check back for updates.

  • Why China is importing a record amount of gold — and what it means for prices

    • Central-bank diversification and a weak property and stock market are driving China’s institutional and retail gold buying.
    • The gold rush would help put a floor under bullion prices, even as the buoyant U.S. yields kept a lid on demand for the non-yielding precious metal.
    • China’s gold reserves still remain well below the U.S. stockpiles.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/12/china-gold-buying-interest-rate-.html

  • US Banks are set to report this week. Here’s what the options market expects

    Bank earnings kick off this week with no fewer than seven of the biggest names set to report. With the S&P 500 near all-time highs, the results could provide a significant market catalyst.

    Financials are the third-worst performing S&P 500 sector in 2026. Despite being flat on the year, the options market is pricing in some big moves as investor weigh the impact of higher rates and stretched consumer.

    Here’s what the options market sees, according to the latest Cboe LiveVol data.

    Goldman Sachs – Tuesday, Oct. 13

    The options market is pricing in a 2.84% move for Goldman Sachs after it reports earnings. Across the last eight reported quarters, the stock has moved just about 2% on average. Only three of those quarters have seen a negative stock reaction, with the most recent being a 1.87% move lower in April.

    The stock rallied a whopping 9% after July’s Q2 report, which is the largest post-earnings move since January, 2019.

    JPMorgan – Tuesday, Oct. 13

    Options are pricing in a move similar to Goldman Sachs for JPMorgan, with a 2.5% implied move inline with its past eight quarter average of 2.22%. Unlike Goldman, JPMorgan’s recent reports haven’t been met with much positivity. The stock’s 2.5% move higher following July’s report was its first positive reaction since April, 2025, when it jumped 4% higher.

    Citigroup – Tuesday, Oct. 13

    Citigroup heads into Tuesday’s report up 11% on the year, best performance of any of this week’s reporting names. Options are pricing in a tame 3% stock reaction in either direction, well below the 3.8% it has averaged across the last eight reported quarters. There is cause for pause, though. Last quarter, the stock surprised to the downside to the tune of 5.3% against a 3.5% implied move.

    Wells Fargo – Tuesday, Oct. 13

    Wells Fargo rounds out Tuesday’s big bank earnings as a name with a lot to prove. Not only is the stock down 10% this year, but it has also flunked its last three earnings reports, including a 5% move lower in April. This time around, options are implying a 3.5% move in either direction. That’s well below its 5.6% average across the last eight quarters.

    Bank of America – Wednesday, Oct. 14

    The options market thinks Bank of America might be able to sneak into positive territory on the year after Wednesday’s report. A move higher would be its third-straight post-earnings win. The current implied stock move is 2.9% in either direction, meaningfully above the 1.8% swing it has averaged across its last eight reported quarters.

    Morgan Stanley – Wednesday, Oct. 14

    This company has rarely put a foot wrong in its recent earnings history. The stock has only moved lower once in its last eight reported quarters, a 1.3% move lower in July, 2025. This time around, options are implying a 3% move in either direction, compared to its eight-quarter average of 4.3%. A move higher on Wednesday would make it five straight for Morgan Stanley.

    BlackRock – Wednesday, Oct. 14

    A move higher would also be five in a row for BlackRock, which jumped nearly 7% following July’s report. Its last negative reaction came last July – a 6% tumble, This time, options are implying a 3.3% move in either direction. That’s tame compared to its 4.4% average across the last eight quarters.