Author: Consultant

  • AI explanation on today’s TSX sell-off (June 5)

    The TSX sell-off today appears to be driven mainly by broad risk-off selling, not one isolated Canadian factor.

    1. Sharp index move: The S&P/TSX Composite was reported down 840.47 points to 34,412.590.
    2. U.S. market weakness spilled into Canada: Yahoo reported that U.S. stocks were also down, which matters because TSX sentiment often follows North American risk appetite. [3]
    3. Big Tech pressure: BNN Bloomberg noted that stocks slumped as Big Tech sank. Weakness in technology can pull down broader equity sentiment, including TSX tech and growth names. [2]
    4. Stronger U.S. jobs data raised rate concerns: A strong May jobs report increased expectations for higher-for-longer interest rates, pressuring equity valuations. [2]
    5. Gold weakness hurt TSX materials: Gold was down sharply, with August gold reported down US$113.90 to US$4,391.10/oz, likely weighing on gold miners and materials. [3]

    Bottom line: Today’s TSX decline looks like a macro-driven sell-off: higher rate fears + U.S. equity weakness + falling gold.

  • June 5/TSX: Stock selloff accelerates as strong jobs reports boost odds for rate hikes

    Wall Street tumbled on Friday as semiconductors extended their selloff while a robust employment report fueled fears of a hawkish policy pivot from the Federal Reserve. It was a similar case for Bay Street, where the TSX was down about 2% in late trading after a strong domestic jobs report also had traders ramping up bets for rate hikes by the Bank of Canada by the end of this year.

    All three major U.S. stock indexes were in negative territory, with an 8.1% ⁠plunge in ​chips, their steepest daily plunge since the “Liberation Day” tariff rout, dragging the tech-laden Nasdaq down 3.1%, its largest one-day percentage drop since October 10.

    Over the last three days of selloffs, tech and chips have tumbled more than 7.5% and 9.1%, respectively.

    The S&P 500 was poised to snap its nine-week run of Friday-to-Friday gains, its longest weekly winning streak since one that ended in December 2023.

    The ​Nasdaq was also on course to log a weekly decline, but the blue-chip Dow ‌was set for a nominal gain on the week.

    Tech shares declined for a third straight session, falling 4.6%. The U.S. economy added 172,000 jobs in May, according to the Labor Department, more than double analyst expectations, while the unemployment rate held firm at 4.3%. The robust report was double-edged: it provided reassurance of U.S. economic health, but all but killed any hopes of an interest rate cut from the Fed in the near future.

    “It’s a good ‌report, and it ​shows that the labour market has certainly ‌survived its latest slowdown, and it’s another reason to believe that the Fed’s next move will be a hike in interest rates,” ​said Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities in New York.

    Financial ⁠markets are pricing in a 42.8% likelihood of a rate hike at the conclusion of the Fed’s December ⁠meeting, up from 38.2% on Thursday and 26.1% one month ago, according to CME’s FedWatch tool.

    Fading hopes for a near-term resolution to the Middle East war and reopening the ​Strait of Hormuz are stirring fears that energy price pressures could morph into wider, systemic inflation. Iran reaffirmed its support for Hezbollah and demanded that Israel withdraw its troops from southern Lebanon, further complicating efforts to secure a near-term peace deal that would include the resumption of traffic through the crucial strait. U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has negotiated three truces, and while fighting has been greatly reduced, the two sides continue to trade airstrikes.

    The CBOE Market Volatility Index, ⁠often dubbed the “fear index,” surged to a two-week high.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 439.25 points, or 0.85%, to 51,122.68, the S&P 500 lost 138.07 points, or 1.82%, to 7,446.24 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 823.61 points, or 3.07%, to 26,007.35.

    Among the 11 S&P 500 sectors, tech was down the most, while consumer staples led the percentage gainers.

    Nvidia, the largest company by market value, lost 5.6%, while Intel, Micron, AMD and Broadcom slid between 6.8% and 10.5%. Lululemon Athletica slumped 8% after the athletic apparel maker cut its annual profit ⁠forecast and projected second-quarter earnings well below Wall Street estimates. Cooper Companies rose 7.6% ​after the contact lens maker beat estimates for second-quarter results.

    Cryptocurrency firms Coinbase and Strategy dropped 9.5% and 11.2% as bitcoin tumbled 4.8%. S&P Global said ⁠it would not change the eligibility requirements for its major indices, which effectively rules out a swift entry for Elon Musk’s SpaceX to the benchmark S&P 500 after it ‌goes public in what would be the world’s biggest initial public offering.

    S&P Dow Jones Indices will announce the results following its rebalancing after markets close. ​Chipmaker Marvell Technology, which boasts over $270 billion in valuation, is among the contenders to be added to the benchmark index.

    Declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 2.8-to-1 ratio on the NYSE. There were 108 new highs and 196 new lows on the NYSE.

    On the Nasdaq, 1,155 stocks rose and 3,548 fell as declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 3.07-to-1 ratio.

    The S&P 500 posted ​14 new 52-week highs and three new lows while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 76 new highs and 143 new lows.

  • Oil prices fall after Oman says Mina al Fahal operations proceeding normally

    Published Thu, Jun 4 202611:46 PM EDT

    Oil prices fell on Friday, after Oman said operations at its Mina al Fahal port ‌were proceeding normally, following a Reuters report of disruption after an explosion.

    Petroleum Development Oman said operations at Mina al Fahal port were unaffected, after three sources told Reuters that oil loading had been suspended following an explosion near its mooring berths.

    Oman exports 800,000 ​to 900,000 barrels per day of crude from the terminal.

    Brent crude futures were down 1.4% at $93.68 a barrel. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $91.17 a barrel, down 2%.

    The contracts rose earlier this week after fighting flared in the Middle East as U.S.-Iran war peace talks dragged on while traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, where a fifth of the world’s oil passes, remained ​limited.

    “As hopes for an agreement between the U.S. and Iran were dashed once again, the price ​of Brent crude and European natural gas rose slightly this week,” Commerzbank analysts said on Friday.

    However, Brent’s gains have ‌been capped ⁠by oil inventories lasting longer than expected, rerouted exports and falling demand, Commerzbank added.

    Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected on Thursday a U.S.-brokered agreement between Israel and the Lebanese government to halt the fighting. Iran has made a ceasefire in Lebanon a condition for any peace deal with Washington.

    U.S. President Donald Trump said ​on Thursday he believed ​progress was being made ⁠between Israel and Lebanon and that Lebanon deserved to have peace.

    “Any optimism remains heavily clouded by a tangled web of headlines and counter-headlines,” IG market ​analyst Tony Sycamore said in a note.

    OPEC is sticking to its oil demand growth ​forecast of ⁠1.2 million barrels per day for this year, Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais said on Thursday, despite the Middle East conflict and closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

    Iranian oil exports have fallen to their lowest level ⁠in ​six years mainly due to the U.S. naval blockade, according ​to shipping data, although weak demand in China has depressed prices for the oil.

  • U.S. labour market shows resilience despite Iran war, adding 172,000 jobs in May

    The American job market continues to show surprising strength, shrugging off the high costs of the Iran war.

    Employers added 172,000 jobs in May – roughly double what forecasters had expected – and the unemployment rate remained at a low 4.3 per cent.

    The Labor Department reported Friday that job growth was down slightly last month from a revised 179,000 in April. The unemployment rate stayed at a low 4.3 per cent.

    Hiring has bounced back this year from a miserable 2025, showing resilience in the face of economic uncertainty and painfully high energy prices caused by the Iran war.

    The job gains last month were broad-based. Local governments added 55,000 workers, restaurants and bars 48,000, health care companies 35,000.

    In another sign of job market strength, Labor Department revisions added a combined 93,000 jobs in March and April. Job growth averaged 188,000 a month from March through May, marking the best three months of hiring since early 2024.

    “The hiring recession is over. American firms are hiring again,” said Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union. “The job rebound is happening in almost every industry … This is encouraging news for job seekers and for the U.S. economy. The labour market has stabilized and is showing early signs of a genuine rebound.’’

    Despite the pickup in hiring, wage gains were modest, which could reassure the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve. Average hourly wages rose 0.3 per cent from April and 3.4 per cent from May, 2025, consistent with the Fed’s 2-per-cent inflation target.

    Financial markets retreated after the report came in, likely reflecting expectations that the Fed won’t see a need to cut interest rates this year because hiring is so healthy.

    Workers, jobseekers and employers have been stuck in an awkward “no-hire, no-fire’’ labour market. “Those who have jobs are clinging to them, while those without are left wanting,” Diane Swonk, chief economist at the tax and consulting firm KPMG, wrote in a commentary ahead of the jobs report. “The result is a sense of being frozen or left in a sort of labour market purgatory.’’

    Many young people are finding it tough to break into a stagnant job market. And workers who have been laid off struggle to get back to work. Nearly 28% of the unemployed in April had been jobless for more than six months, biggest share since December, 2021.

    Seeing their prospects diminished, Americans are reluctant to leave their jobs and seek something better elsewhere. In April, the number of people who quit dropped to the lowest level since the frightening days of August, 2020, when the COVID-19 was running rampant.

    Last year, employers added 9,700 jobs a month, fewest outside a recession since 2002.

    This year, hiring has rebounded, averaging 114,000 new jobs a month from January through May. Big tax refunds – the product of President Donald Trump’s 2025 tax cuts – have given the economy a lift, offsetting the impact of higher energy prices since the United States and Israel attacked Iran in late February. But the refunds have mostly been pocketed, and gasoline prices remain above US$4 per gallon.

    Healthcare companies have been driving much of hiring over the past year.

    Martha Gimbel and Ryan Nunn of Yale University’s Budget Lab note that strong healthcare hiring isn’t surprising as Americans age and need more prescriptions and trips to the doctor. In fact, the industry’s job growth is in line with Labor Department predictions from a decade ago. “The question is not why healthcare has kept hiring–it is why other industries have not,’’ they wrote in a report published Tuesday, suggesting that one explanation might be an immigration crackdown that has reduced the supply of foreign-born workers.

    At least the United States doesn’t need as many new jobs as it used to. The drop in immigrants and rising Baby Boomer retirements mean that fewer people are competing for work. As a result, the so-called break-even point – the number of new jobs required to keep the unemployment rate stable – has likely dropped to near zero, from the 155,000 new jobs per month that was typical two or three years ago, according to a Federal Reserve report.

    Some analysts fear that artificial intelligence will wipe out entry-level jobs. But economists Gregory Daco and Lydia Boussour of the tax and consulting firm EY-Parthenon wrote in a commentary Tuesday that AI “adoption is proving more gradual and costly than many anticipated. Firms are increasingly using AI to enhance productivity and control labour costs.’’ But AI, they wrote, has reduced hiring rather than “triggering broad-based layoffs.″

    And a new study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York identified a different culprit for young people’s struggle to land jobs after college: the rise of remote work. Businesses, it seems, are reluctant to hire new grads for work-at-home jobs because it is harder to train and mentor them when they aren’t coming into the office.

  • Canada adds 87,800 jobs in May, jobless rate falls to 6.6%, beating estimates

    Canada’s economy added 87,800 jobs and the unemployment rate fell to 6.6% in May, data showed on Friday, defying widespread expectations of only modest employment growth and showing some resilience despite signs of softer economic growth.

    The May data marked the first job growth of 2026 and helped wipe out almost 80 per cent of all job losses posted since the start of the year.

    The last time the economy added a significant number of jobs was October, 2025, Statistics Canada said. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast the unemployment rate last month would hold steady at the six-month high of 6.9 per cent reached in April and had predicted a net gain of 10,000 jobs.

    or more than a year, Canada’s economy has weathered an onslaught of U.S. tariffs and trade uncertainty, which has hit some crucial sectors very hard and led to job losses. It has also sucked hiring momentum and investments out of the broader economy.

    The Canadian economy entered a technical recession – two consecutive quarters of economic contraction – at the end of the first quarter on an annualized basis. But economists have been divided on whether it was actually in recession, as there have been no widespread job losses and some sectors have shown healthy growth.

    Statscan said the construction sector added a net 26,800 jobs, the information, culture and recreation sector saw a gain of 19,300 jobs, transportation and warehousing employment grew by 18,700 jobs and accommodation and food services gained 17,000 jobs.

    The wholesale and retail trade sector, which accounts for almost 14 per cent of the total employed workforce, posted a decline of 35,000 positions.

    Economists have said that the upcoming FIFA World Cup soccer tournament, which is being partly hosted by Canada, will also likely boost jobs in the months of June and July across some sectors.

    The job growth last month was concentrated entirely in full-time jobs, which saw a net addition of 154,000 in May, reversing almost all of the first four months of net job losses in that category, StatsCan said. Part-time employment fell by 66,200 positions.

    Average hourly wages of permanent employees, a metric closely tracked by the Bank of Canada to gauge inflation expectations, grew 3.2 per cent in May, a sharp decline from 4.8 per cent in April.

    The unemployment rate for youth declined 0.9 percentage points to 13.4 per cent, the first decline since January, Statscan said.

  • June 5/26: TSX Sell -Off

    The TSX decline today appears driven by three main factors:

    1. Broad market selloff: Canada’s main index was down more than 500 points in late-morning trading, indicating a broad risk-off move rather than a single-stock issue. [1] [2]
    2. Sector pressure: Losses were concentrated in base metals and technology, two higher-beta areas that tend to fall harder when investors reduce risk exposure. [1] [2]
    3. Rate/inflation concern: Strong jobs data raised concern that interest rates may stay higher for longer, pressuring equity valuations. The Globe notes the TSX was set to erase weekly gains amid commodity volatility and persistent inflation fears. [5]

    Bottom line: Today’s TSX drop is mainly a macro + sector rotation decline: stronger economic data → higher-rate fears → valuation pressure, amplified by weakness in metals and technology.

    🌐 Sources

  • How Warsh Could Sink Inflation And Stocks

    Kevin Warsh, the former Fed Governor recently confirmed as Federal Reserve Chair (as of mid-2026), is known for hawkish leanings on inflation control. His approach could aggressively target inflation but risk pressuring stock valuations, especially growth and tech stocks that thrive on low rates and easy liquidity.

    Warsh’s Key Views on Inflation and Policy

    Warsh has criticized the Fed’s standard Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) measure as imperfect. He favors alternatives like the trimmed mean inflation gauge, which strips out volatile outliers (e.g., from tariffs, geopolitics, energy shocks, or one-off items like beef prices) to better capture “underlying” inflation.

    He has described price stability subjectively: “a change in prices such that no one’s talking about it.” This is stricter than the traditional 2% target and perception-driven, potentially requiring lower sustained inflation to restore public confidence.

    Warsh is seen as an inflation hawk historically. He prioritizes interest rates as the primary tool over quantitative easing (QE) and wants to shrink the Fed’s bloated balance sheet (over $6 trillion). He argues government spending, fiscal policy, and money supply growth drive inflation more than wages in some cases.

    How This Could “Sink” (Reduce) Inflation

    • Higher-for-longer rates or slower cuts: If trimmed mean or underlying measures show persistent inflation (amid energy shocks, tariffs, or fiscal pressures), Warsh could resist aggressive rate cuts or even signal hikes. This cools demand, anchors expectations, and reduces price pressures.
    • Balance sheet reduction: Allowing bonds to mature without full reinvestment or outright sales drains liquidity. This tightens financial conditions, supports a stronger dollar, and curbs inflationary excess.
    • Less forward guidance: Warsh prefers markets interpret data in real time rather than “prepackaged” signals. This could lead to faster price discovery and less accommodative policy surprises that fuel inflation.
    • AI/productivity optimism with discipline: He acknowledges AI could boost growth without inflation, but pairs it with caution—only cutting rates if underlying metrics confirm control, avoiding the mistakes of past overshooting.

    Recent context (as of June 2026) includes reaccelerating inflation from energy/geopolitical factors, making this hawkish tilt more relevant.

    How This Could Sink Stocks

    • Higher rates / tighter policy → Higher discount rates crush valuations of long-duration assets like growth/tech stocks. Even modest hikes or delayed cuts could trigger selloffs.
    • Liquidity drain from QT: Shrinking the balance sheet reduces excess reserves and Fed support for markets, potentially raising risk premia and hurting equities (especially if not offset by deep rate cuts).
    • Uncertainty and perception shift: Moving away from a clear 2% target to a subjective “no one’s talking about it” standard makes policy less predictable. Markets price in a more demanding inflation fight, leading to volatility and lower multiples.
    • Conflict with growth narrative: While AI optimism exists, a hawkish stance clashes with expectations of easy policy under the current administration, risking disappointment rallies or corrections.

    Small, incremental tightening might limit damage and avoid a full bear market, but aggressive action on sticky inflation could amplify downside.

    Bottom Line and Risks

    Warsh’s toolkit—alternative inflation metrics, rate discipline, and balance sheet normalization—aims to restore credibility and fight inflation more effectively than recent frameworks. This could succeed in “sinking” inflation but at the cost of higher volatility and lower stock prices in the near term, particularly for rate-sensitive sectors.

    Challenges include balancing this with political pressures, Fed colleagues, and external shocks (energy, fiscal policy). Markets are watching his first meetings closely for signals. Outcomes depend on incoming data; persistent inflation would amplify the tightening pressure, while rapid disinflation could allow easier policy. This remains a high-stakes shift from prior Fed leadership.

  • Elon Musk’s net worth poised to sail past $1 trillion in SpaceX IPO

    • Based on SpaceX’s updated IPO prospectus, Elon Musk owns shares in the company worth more than $866 billion.
    • That’s on top of Musk’s $350 billion-plus stake in Tesla.
    • Already the world’s richest person, Musk is poised to become the first trillionaire.

    The world’s richest person is on the doorstep of trillionaire status.

    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk owns a stake in his reusable rocket maker that’s worth $866.5 billion on paper, according to the company’s updated IPO prospectus published on Wednesday. SpaceX said it plans to price its upcoming IPO at $135 a share for a valuation of about $1.77 trillion.

    For the 54-year-old Musk, the SpaceX offering, which is expected next week, comes 16 years after he took Tesla public. Now he owns stock in the electric vehicle maker that’s worth about $355 billion, and has options that could add more than $100 billion to that number.

    Musk’s voting control of SpaceX after the offering will be north of 82%, according to Wednesday’s filing. However, he has to hold onto all of his shares for a year.

    “We believe that Mr. Musk’s substantial ownership interest in us provides him with an economic incentive to assist us to be successful,” SpaceX said in the risk factors section of the prospectus. After the 366-day lock-up period, “Mr. Musk will not be subject to any obligation to maintain his ownership interest in us and may elect at any time thereafter to sell all or a substantial portion of or otherwise reduce his ownership interest in us,” the filing says.

    Musk’s net worth has been steadily building for well over a decade, with Tesla’s stock starting to pop in a big way in 2013. He first became the world’s wealthiest person in 2021, passing Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. But Tesla’s stock sank 65% in 2022, before again soaring to new heights in the years that followed.

    Forbes currently lists Musk’s net worth at $826 billion, way above Google co-founder Larry Page, who sits in second place just below $300 billion.

    Assuming SpaceX hits the Nasdaq next week at or near its expected valuation, Musk will oversee two of the eight most valuable U.S. companies. SpaceX would be ahead of Tesla and Meta among the trillion-dollar names.

    But by revenue, SpaceX is much smaller than those megacaps. Last year, SpaceX generated sales of $18.67 billion. Meta, meanwhile, topped $200 billion in revenue, and Tesla recorded sales of almost $95 billion.

    Some investors have speculated of late that Musk’s ultimate plan could be to merge SpaceX and Tesla as a way to consolidate artificial intelligence resources and to streamline future capital raises. He has lucrative economic incentives at each company that include some far-out benchmarks.

    SpaceX has linked Musk’s compensation rewards to two milestones: achieving a $7.5 trillion market cap and colonizing Mars with at least 1 million inhabitants. Meanwhile, Tesla shareholders approved a pay plan late last year that consists of 12 tranches, with each payout tied to market-cap gains and operational achievements.

    WATCHSpaceX looking to price IPO at $135 per share

    — CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report.

  • US June 4 @ 12 Noon EDT: Dow jumps 900 points, Nasdaq slides as investors rotate out of chip stocks for banks, retail

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied to a fresh record high on Thursday, while the Nasdaq Composite fell as investors appeared to rotate out of chip names in favor of non-tech stocks.

    The 30-stock Dow jumped 911 points, or 1.8%. The Nasdaq lost 0.2%, while the S&P 500 rose 0.3%.

    UnitedHealth led the Dow higher, rising 5.8%. JPMorgan Chase and Walmart added to the benchmark’s advance, climbing 2.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Non-tech names outside of the Dow such as Costco and Eli Lilly gained 2% and 4.5%, respectively.

    The rotation was sparked by a sell-off in Broadcom that led investors to pare exposure to stocks with ties to artificial intelligence. The chipmaker traded 15% lower after the it reported a fiscal second-quarter revenue miss. Semiconductor names, which led the latest leg higher in the market’s rally to record levels, fell broadly. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) lost more than 2%. Arm Holdings shed 6%, and Micron Technology pulled back by 7.7%.

    “After an astonishing earnings season, the AI trade is still alive and well, but this rally is getting tired after an incredible more than two-month surge,” said Dennis Follmer, chief investment officer at Montis Financial. “With no end in sight for the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz, we would not be surprised to see stocks stall for a while as that reality sinks in and it catches its breath from this recent streak.”

    The day’s moves “suggest the early innings of a rotation and it’s also a reminder that not all AI stocks are the same and there are different expectations built into each stock,” he added.

    Thursday’s moves follow a losing day on Wall Street, with stocks pressured by rising tensions in the Middle East. Attacks escalated between the U.S. and Iran. Iran struck Kuwait International Airport early Wednesday, while one day earlier U.S. Central Command said it had defeated multiple Iranian ballistic missiles and drones, and carried out “self-defense strikes” on Qeshm Island in the Persian Gulf. It said that this was in response to “attempted attacks” by Tehran.