Micron topped a $1 trillion market value for the first time on Tuesday as shares popped 18% on strong artificial intelligence demand for its memory chips.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/26/micron-stock-trillion-market-cap.html
Micron topped a $1 trillion market value for the first time on Tuesday as shares popped 18% on strong artificial intelligence demand for its memory chips.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/26/micron-stock-trillion-market-cap.html
Canada’s biggest banks are set to post a round of resilient profits, bucking economic uncertainty and looming trade pressure ahead of talks to renew the USMCA.
Analysts expect capital markets and wealth management activity to continue to bolster profits while loan growth slows and credit losses remain at elevated but manageable levels. Canadian bank stocks have surged 16 per cent this year on the optimism surrounding the sector’s ability to withstand economic uncertainty, outperforming the S&P/TSX Composite Index’s 8-per-cent climb.
While banks are expected to post strong earnings results next week, investor reaction will depend on management’s expectations for the latter half of the year, Jefferies analyst John Aiken said in a note to clients.
“Despite some serious potential headwinds, the Canadian banks continue to boast almost historically high valuations,” Mr. Aiken said. “We do not anticipate that the Q2 earnings will put this at risk, but with almost all the upside priced in, any questions surrounding promised robustness of the second half of 2026 could potentially upset the apple cart.”
Canada’s six largest lenders report over the course of two days. “It’s going to be a banger,” Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce analyst Paul Holden said in a note.
On Wednesday, Bank of Nova Scotia BNS-T +0.68%increase, Bank of Montreal BMO-T +1.09%increase and National Bank of Canada NA-T +0.12%increase will report earnings for the three months ended April 30. Royal Bank of Canada RY-T +0.53%increase, Toronto-Dominion Bank TD-T +1.01%increase and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce CM-T +0.82%increase will post earnings on Thursday.
Analysis: How Canada’s big banks turned mortgages into a nearly risk-free cash machine
The lenders have benefited from “a positive halo effect” from a “resource-rich economy, pro-business Carney government,” Bank of America analyst Ebrahim H. Poonawala said in a note. Those factors encouraged investors to look past Canada’s challenged job and housing markets, as well as uncertainty over the coming renegotiation of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, he added.
In recent years, capital markets activity has propped up bank profits. Volatile equity markets have boosted trading activity, softening the impact of dampened loan demand from consumers and businesses.
To beat analysts’ expectations, the banks will again have to rely on stronger profits from their capital markets units, National Bank of Canada analyst Gabriel Dechaine said in a note.
“Barring a margin or credit surprise, the onus falls on the capital markets to deliver this outcome, which isn’t impossible considering several favourable market conditions,” Mr. Dechaine said.
Scotiabank analyst Mike Rizvanovic said recent discussions with senior bankers suggest that the pipeline for mergers and acquisitions and equity and debt capital markets has been constructive, and elevated market volatility should continue to propel trading revenue.
He expects capital markets earnings to grow by 13 per cent compared with the same quarter last year.
Mr. Rizvanovic said loan volumes are likely to be “anemic,” weighed down by weakness in mortgages and real estate secured lending.
Canada’s big banks could cut costs by closing more branches, analyst report says
Analysts anticipate provisions for credit losses – the money banks set aside to cover loan defaults – to edge higher. The provisions are a closely watched measure of financial stress among consumers and businesses.
Last quarter, delinquencies of more than 90 days rose across credit cards, unsecured lines of credit, mortgages and auto loans as more customers struggled to pay off their loans.
Provisions for impaired loans – debt that is unlikely to be repaid – are expected to rise in the second quarter, offsetting lower provisions for loans that are still being repaid.
“We are getting more cautious on credit losses given the weakness in Canadian unemployment, a soft housing market in the GTA, and industry credit metrics,” Mr. Holden said.
Based on recent TSX 60 performance trends, sector moves, and major market declines during the May 15 yield/inflation selloff, the following large-cap TSX names were among the weakest performers over roughly the past 10 trading days.
| Rank | Stock | Approx. 10-Day Trend | Primary Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shopify Inc. (SHOP.TO) | Sharp decline / volatile | Weak guidance + rising bond yields + AI valuation concerns |
| 2 | Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) | Significant decline | Consumer discretionary weakness + rate fears |
| 3 | Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) | Weakness | Oil-price volatility + profit taking |
| 4 | Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) | Moderate decline | Oil volatility + inflation concerns |
| 5 | Magna International Inc. (MG.TO) | High volatility | Auto-cycle fears + tariff concerns |
| 6 | Kinaxis Inc. (KXS.TO) | Weakness | SaaS valuation compression + yield sensitivity |
| 7 | Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC.A.TO) | Sharp drop then rebound | Consumer-spending fears |
| 8 | Barrick Mining Corporation (ABX.TO) | Decline | Gold-price weakness + falling metals |
| 9 | First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) | Significant weakness | Copper-price decline |
| 10 | Open Text Corporation (OTEX.TO) | Moderate decline | Technology-sector pressure |
The May 15 bond-market selloff was one of the largest drivers of TSX weakness. Higher yields pressured:
Most affected:
Higher:
Most affected:
Materials stocks weakened sharply as:
Most affected:
TSX technology stocks sold off aggressively after:
Shopify was particularly impacted after disappointing forward guidance earlier in May.
Several of these stocks:
So:
some names remain down materially,
while others recovered part of the decline.
| Sector | Main Pressure |
|---|---|
| Technology | Bond yields + AI valuation |
| Consumer Discretionary | Consumer-spending fears |
| Materials | Gold/copper decline |
| Energy | Oil volatility |
| Industrials | Tariff/recession concerns |
The largest TSX 60 declines over the past ~10 trading days were mainly concentrated in:
The primary macro drivers were:
This is currently the biggest macro risk for the TSX and global equities.
Higher yields:
| Sector | Impact |
|---|---|
| Technology (TTTK) | Negative |
| Consumer Discretionary (TTCD) | Negative |
| REITs | Negative |
| Financials | Mixed |
| Utilities | Negative |
If yields continue rising:
the TSX could face another volatility wave.
Oil remains one of the largest TSX drivers.
Canada benefits from:
But:
higher gasoline prices also:
| Oil Direction | Likely TSX Effect |
|---|---|
| Oil rising moderately | Positive for TSX |
| Oil spike > US$110 | Negative overall due to inflation fear |
| Oil falling sharply | Hurts energy stocks |
Canadian financials heavily influence the TSX.
Banks represent:
| Metric | Importance |
|---|---|
| Loan losses | Very high |
| Mortgage performance | High |
| Consumer credit stress | High |
| Net interest margins | High |
| Guidance | Critical |
TSX could move materially higher.
financials could drag the index lower.
Markets are highly focused on inflation again.
Reuters noted:
next week’s U.S. PCE inflation release is a major market catalyst.
Higher inflation:
Lower inflation:
| Sector | Sensitivity |
|---|---|
| TTTK (Tech) | Very High |
| TTCD (Discretionary) | High |
| REITs | High |
| Utilities | Moderate |
The TSX is heavily exposed to:
Gold and copper weakened recently as:
| Commodity | TSX Impact |
|---|---|
| Gold rising | Positive for miners |
| Copper rising | Positive for industrial/materials |
| Gold falling | Negative for materials sector |
Materials remain one of the TSX’s largest volatility drivers.
Even though Canada has less technology weighting than the U.S.,
AI sentiment still strongly impacts:
Markets continue reacting to:
Strong Nasdaq performance:
usually helps:
The market is increasingly worried about:
Recent Canadian retail data showed:
| Sector | Exposure |
|---|---|
| TTCD | High |
| Retailers | High |
| Banks | High |
| Staples | Defensive beneficiary |
Markets are rotating rapidly between:
| Sector | Current Bias |
|---|---|
| Financials | Improving |
| Technology | Strong rebound |
| Energy | Oil-dependent |
| Staples | Defensive support |
| Materials | Highly volatile |
Markets are becoming:
more macro-driven,
less earnings-driven.
| Scenario | Conditions | TSX Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Bull | Falling yields + stable oil + strong bank earnings | TSX pushes toward highs |
| Base | Volatile but stable macro | Sideways/upward bias |
| Bear | Yield spike + oil shock + weak consumer data | TSX correction risk |
| Indicator | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| U.S. 10-year yield | Equity valuation driver |
| WTI crude oil | Inflation + TSX energy |
| Gold price | Materials sector |
| CAD/USD | Commodity & export signal |
| Bank earnings | TSX weighting |
| U.S. PCE inflation | Rate expectations |
| Nasdaq performance | Tech sentiment spillover |
For the coming week, the TSX will likely be driven primarily by:
The market environment remains:
“highly macro-sensitive.”
That means:
Monday May 25
U.K. markets closed (Spring Bank Holiday)
U.S. markets closed (Memorial Day)
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canadian wholesale trade for April.
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s construction investment for March
Tuesday May 26
Japan’s machine tool orders
(8:15 a.m. ET) U.S. ADP National Employment Report estimate for May 9.
(9 a.m. ET) U.S. S&P Cotality Case-Shiller Home Price Index for March. The Street is projecting a rise of 0.1 per cent from March and 1.2 per cent year-over-year.
(9 a.m. ET) U.S. FHFA House Price Index for March. The consensus estimates are an increase of 0.1 per cent from March and 1.8 per cent year-over-year.
(10 a.m. ET) U.S. Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index for May.
Earnings include: Elbit Systems Ltd.; Zscaler Inc.
Wednesday May 27
China’s industrial profits
Earnings include: Bank of Montreal; Bank of Nova Scotia; Best Buy Co. Inc.; Champion Iron Ltd.; EQB Inc.; HP Inc.; Marvell Technology Inc.; National Bank of Canada; Salesforce Inc.; Snowflake Inc.
Thursday May 28
Euro zone consumer and economic confidence
ECB minutes from April monetary policy meeting are released
(6 a.m. ET) U.S. Conference Board CEO Confidence Index for Q1.
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s current account balance for Q1.
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours for March.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. initial jobless claims for week of May 23. Estimate is 213,000, up 4,000 from the previous week.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. Real GDP for Q1. Consensus is a 2.1-per-cent annualized increase.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. PCE Price Index for April. Consensus is a year-over-year rise of 3.9 per cent.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. personal income and consumption for April. The Street is expecting month-over-month increases of 0.4 per cent for both.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. durable and core goods orders for April. The consensus projections are increases of 3.2 per cent and 0.5 per cent from March, respectively.
(10 a.m. ET) Bank of Canada’s Financial Stability Report with press conference to follow.
(10 a.m. ET) U.S. new home sales for April.
Earnings include: Autodesk Inc.; BRP Inc.; Dell Technologies Inc.; Dollar Tree Inc.; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce; Lululemon Athletica Inc.; Royal Bank of Canada; Toronto-Dominion Bank
Friday May 29
Japan’s CPI, jobless rate, consumer confidence, retail sales and industrial production
Germany’s CPI and unemployment
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s Real GDP for Q1. The Street is anticipating a gain of 1.4 per cent from Q4.
(8:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s monthly real GDP for March. Consensus is a 0.1-per-cent increase from February
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. wholesale and retail inventories for April.
(8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. goods trade deficit for April.
Earnings include: Laurentian Bank of Canada
| Date | Approx. Price Action |
|---|---|
| May 12–13 | Sharp weakness |
| May 14–15 | Strong rebound begins |
| May 16–22 | Continued recovery with volatility |
SHOP recovered from:
This was the largest macro driver.
Technology stocks are highly sensitive to:
On May 15:
After May 16:
That strongly benefited Shopify.
Global technology sentiment improved rapidly after the selloff.
Investors resumed buying:
Shopify benefited because markets increasingly position it as:
Broader Nasdaq strength spilled into:
SHOP had sold off aggressively earlier because:
Once macro panic eased:
That amplified the rebound.
Despite economic uncertainty:
markets still believe:
Investors continue viewing Shopify as:
“a structural growth platform”
rather than:
“a traditional retailer.”
Markets continue rewarding companies perceived as:
Shopify’s AI tools for:
This supports premium valuation multiples.
SHOP remains volatile because:
valuation is still very high.
Concerns include:
The stock trades more on:
future expectations
than current earnings stability.
This was the key company-specific driver.
Kinaxis reported:
Markets reacted positively because:
That improved investor confidence materially.
Kinaxis benefits from:
Markets increasingly believe:
global supply-chain complexity remains structurally elevated.
That supports long-term demand for:
Despite strong fundamentals,
KXS remains sensitive to:
That explains why:
the stock recovery was more moderate than Shopify’s.
Enterprise SaaS stocks generally underperformed:
AI momentum names
during parts of the recent rally.
KXS had previously declined materially from prior highs:
This created:
Recent stabilization likely reflects:
markets reassessing excessive pessimism.
Even during economic uncertainty:
companies still need:
That gives Kinaxis:
relatively defensive enterprise-software characteristics.
This differentiates it somewhat from:
consumer-facing software names.
| Factor | SHOP.TO | KXS.TO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility | Very High | Moderate |
| Main Driver | AI + growth sentiment | Earnings + enterprise software |
| Macro Sensitivity | Very High | High |
| Valuation Sensitivity | Very High | High |
| Recovery Strength | Stronger | Moderate |
| Institutional View | High-growth platform | Enterprise software compounder |
Bond Yields Stabilize
→ AI Optimism Returns
→ Growth Stocks Rally
→ SHOP Rebounds Strongly
Strong Earnings
→ Margin Improvement
→ AI Supply-Chain Narrative
→ Moderate SaaS Recovery
| Risk | SHOP.TO | KXS.TO |
|---|---|---|
| Rising bond yields | Major risk | Major risk |
| Slower spending | Consumer exposure | Enterprise IT exposure |
| Valuation compression | Very high risk | Moderate-high |
| AI hype normalization | High | Moderate |
| Economic slowdown | Moderate | Moderate |
Recent performance was driven mainly by:
The stock continues trading primarily on:
future growth expectations.
Recent performance was driven more by:
KXS currently behaves more like:
“a profitable enterprise software compounder”
than:
“a speculative AI momentum stock.”
TTTK weakened significantly during the May 15 market decline because:
Technology stocks are especially vulnerable to:
Why:
Technology valuations depend heavily on:
future earnings growth.
When interest rates rise:
future cash flows become worth less in present-value terms.
That causes:
TTTK therefore sold off harder than:
After May 16:
markets stabilized because:
This reignited:
The Nasdaq recovered strongly,
which spilled over into Canadian technology stocks.
TTTK benefited directly because:
the TSX technology sector is heavily influenced by:
Shopify Inc. remains one of the largest weights in TTTK.
Over the past 10 days:
Shopify recovered strongly after the macro selloff because:
Shopify tends to amplify TTTK movements because:
its market capitalization heavily influences the index.
When Shopify rallies:
TTTK usually strengthens materially.
Constellation Software Inc. also helped support TTTK.
Markets continue viewing CSU as:
Institutional investors rotated into:
That supported:
This was probably the most important macro factor.
After May 16:
Technology stocks responded positively because:
lower/stable yields improve:
This triggered:
Markets remain highly focused on:
Even after volatility,
investors still expect:
That supports:
TTTK therefore continues benefiting from:
the global AI investment cycle.
During the May 15 selloff:
many investors reduced:
When markets stabilized:
short sellers rapidly covered positions.
This accelerated:
TTTK’s recovery therefore became:
part fundamental,
part technical.
One important factor:
TTTK is not broadly diversified like the Nasdaq.
The index is highly concentrated in:
That concentration increases volatility because:
a few large names can strongly move the entire index.
The past 10 days roughly followed:
Bond Yields Spike
→ Technology Stocks Sell Off
→ AI Momentum Temporarily Pauses
→ Bond Yields Stabilize
→ U.S. Tech Rebounds
→ AI Optimism Returns
→ TTTK Recovers Strongly
| Sector | Past 10 Days |
|---|---|
| TTTK (Technology) | Strong rebound / high volatility |
| TTCD (Discretionary) | Moderate recovery |
| TTCS (Staples) | Defensive stability |
| Financials | Gradual recovery |
| Materials | Commodity-driven rebound |
TTTK showed:
Despite the recovery,
markets still worry about:
| Risk | Concern |
|---|---|
| Rising bond yields | Valuation compression |
| AI overvaluation | Multiple risk |
| Economic slowdown | Enterprise spending |
| High tech multiples | Correction risk |
| Geopolitical shocks | Risk-off selling |
Technology remains:
the most sentiment-sensitive TSX sector.
| Time Horizon | Main Driver |
|---|---|
| Short-Term | Bond yields + AI sentiment |
| Medium-Term | Earnings growth + cloud spending |
| Long-Term | AI infrastructure cycle |
| Scenario | Conditions | TTTK Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Bull | Stable yields + accelerating AI spending | Further strong upside |
| Base | Moderate growth + volatile yields | Continued volatility with upward bias |
| Bear | Yield spike + AI spending slowdown | Sharp correction risk |
TTTK performance over the past 10 days was primarily driven by:
The sector remains:
“high-growth but macro-sensitive.”
That means:
TTTK can both:
This was the primary driver.
After the May 15 TSX selloff:
investors moved away from:
and toward:
WN.TO benefited because its largest asset is:
Since grocery demand remains stable even during:
markets treated WN.TO as:
“a defensive capital-preservation stock.”
WN.TO owns a controlling stake in:
Loblaw recently reported:
That directly increased:
Because Loblaw shares remained resilient during market volatility,
WN.TO also held up strongly.
Canadian consumers continue:
That benefits:
Markets increasingly believe:
food retail remains one of the safest Canadian consumer segments in the current environment.
This indirectly strengthened WN.TO.
WN.TO also has exposure to:
Why this mattered:
Markets became more comfortable with:
Compared with office/commercial real estate stress,
Choice Properties is viewed as:
relatively defensive.
That improved sentiment toward WN.TO’s asset base.
During periods of uncertainty,
institutions often favour:
WN.TO fits that profile because:
it effectively combines:
This increased:
On May 15:
bond yields surged sharply,
which hurt most equities.
After May 16:
This helped:
WN.TO benefited because:
markets became more comfortable with:
Historically,
holding companies sometimes trade below:
Recently:
investors began narrowing the implied discount because:
This supported incremental upside in WN.TO shares.
Unlike:
WN.TO moved more steadily because:
So the stock behaved as:
“steady defensive appreciation”
rather than:
“high-beta rebound.”
The past 10 days roughly followed:
Macro Volatility Increases
→ Investors Seek Defensive Sectors
→ Grocery & Pharmacy Stocks Outperform
→ Loblaw Strength Supports WN.TO
→ Institutions Rotate Into Stable Compounders
→ WN.TO Remains Strong
| Risk | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Grocery margin pressure | Lower profitability |
| Political/regulatory scrutiny | Pricing pressure |
| Food inflation normalization | Slower earnings growth |
| Real-estate valuation risk | Choice Properties exposure |
| High valuation multiples | Limited upside expansion |
| Time Horizon | Main Driver |
|---|---|
| Short-Term | Defensive sector rotation |
| Medium-Term | Grocery/pharmacy earnings resilience |
| Long-Term | Stable compounding + asset-value growth |
| Scenario | Conditions | WN.TO Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Bull | Continued defensive rotation + stable earnings | Further gradual appreciation |
| Base | Moderate economic slowdown | Stable outperformance |
| Bear | Strong cyclical rebound elsewhere | Relative underperformance |
WN.TO’s performance over the past 10 days reflects:
The stock has recently traded as:
“a defensive holding-company compounder”
rather than:
“a cyclical consumer stock.”
| Date Range | Approx. Behaviour |
|---|---|
| May 8–12 | Strong rebound |
| May 15 | Mild pullback during TSX selloff |
| May 16–22 | Stabilization and gradual recovery |
The stock remained relatively stable around:
That relative stability itself is important.
This was the biggest driver.
After the May 15 macro selloff:
investors rotated away from:
and toward:
Loblaw benefited directly because:
consumers continue buying:
That makes earnings more predictable.
Loblaw reported:
Important positives included:
Markets particularly liked:
This reinforced the thesis that Loblaw remains:
“an all-weather earnings company.”
A major theme:
Canadian consumers continue “trading down.”
That benefited:
Why:
Consumers remain pressured by:
Markets believe:
value grocery chains are gaining share during this environment.
That supports Loblaw’s growth despite slower consumer spending broadly.
Loblaw announced a large Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB):
Why markets liked this:
Buybacks are especially supportive during uncertain markets because:
they provide downside support.
Institutional investors increasingly treat Loblaw similarly to:
Why:
Loblaw combines:
That diversification improves:
Loblaw announced plans to:
Markets viewed this positively because:
The company is also investing heavily in:
When bond yields surged on May 15:
Loblaw held up comparatively well because:
defensive staples typically:
This helped attract institutional capital during volatility.
Despite strong relative performance,
L.TO did not experience a speculative spike because:
So the stock behaved more like:
“steady capital preservation”
than:
“momentum trading.”
The past 10 days roughly followed:
Market Volatility Increases
→ Investors Seek Defensive Sectors
→ Consumers Continue Trading Down
→ Loblaw Earnings Stay Strong
→ Buyback Program Supports Confidence
→ Institutions Rotate Into Staples
→ L.TO Remains Resilient
| Risk | Concern |
|---|---|
| Food inflation normalization | Margin pressure |
| Political/regulatory pressure | Grocery pricing scrutiny |
| Consumer weakness | Basket-size slowdown |
| Valuation | Premium multiple risk |
| Labour/logistics costs | Margin compression |
| Time Horizon | Main Driver |
|---|---|
| Short-Term | Defensive capital rotation |
| Medium-Term | Discount grocery growth |
| Long-Term | Automation + pharmacy + loyalty ecosystem |
| Scenario | Conditions | L.TO Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Bull | Consumer trade-down continues + strong margins | Continued defensive outperformance |
| Base | Stable economy + moderate growth | Gradual appreciation |
| Bear | Valuation compression + slowing traffic | Sideways/pullback |
L.TO’s performance over the past 10 days reflects:
The stock has recently traded as:
“a defensive growth compounder”
rather than:
“a traditional low-growth grocer.”