Author: Consultant

  • FIRST READING: Is the technical recession recession just a technicality, technically?

    On Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre rejected reports that Canada was in “technical recession,” saying that the country’s economic malaise was not a “technicality.”

    Article content

    “(Prime Minister Mark) Carney says we’re not in a real recession, as he sent out his Liberal commentators and economists to say it’s just a technicality,” said Poilievre at a press conference announcing that Canada was in the grip of a “full-blown Carney Recession.”

    Article content

    Article content

    On Friday, Statistics Canada announced that GDP had gone down in the first quarter of 2026. This indeed marks Canada’s official entry into the generally accepted definition of “recession,” but only by one of the smallest possible margins in Canadian economic history.

    Recessions are generally “called” after two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. In other words, a country’s economy has shrunk for at least six months.

    Article content

    In the final quarter of 2025, the Canadian economy shrunk by one per cent. And then, in the first quarter of 2026, it contracted again by the razor thin margin of 0.1 per cent.

    Article content

    In December 2025, Canadian GDP was pegged at $2,339,770,000,000 in 2017 dollars. At the end of March, it came in at $2,339,730,000,000 in 2017 dollars. A difference of about $400 million is what delivered the 0.1 per cent decline, and thus tipped Canada into recession.

    Article content

    Robert Kavcic, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, wrote in a note to investors that the decline in the Canadian economy seen over the last six months is “barely a scratch in GDP terms.”

    Article content

    The 0.1 per cent decline in the first quarter of 2026 is such a tight margin that it’s entirely possible that if the end of March had come a few days later or earlier, the stats would not have shown a recession at all.

    Article content

    Article content

    In February, the Canadian economy had actually been growing; GDP grew by an average of about $150 million per day. But in March, all these gains were reversed by an average daily GDP decline of about $113 million.

    A May 29 note by RBC economist Nathan Janzen, for instance, suggested that the 0.1 per cent decline may already be gone. Although Janzen warned that estimates are “highly revision prone,” the early GDP estimates for April were showing a 0.4 per cent increase, driven in part by high oil prices.

    Article content

    The Conservatives’ point, however, is that Canada’s entry into recession is only the latest indicator of ill health for an economy that was supposed to be running at full speed.

    Article content

    Poilievre noted that insolvencies are currently at highs not seen since 2009, Canadian household debt remains the highest in the G7, and unemployment is currently the second worst in the G7.

    Article content

    The latest Statistics Canada figures show unemployment at 6.9 per cent, slightly worse than the 6.8 per cent Canada was posting when Carney was first sworn in as prime minister in March 2025.

    Article content

    Canada is also the only developed country whose last two quarters have been defined by contraction, however slight.

    “Why is it that only Canada, after a year of Mark Carney, is in a recession today?” said Poilievre on Monday.

    Article content

    The term “technical recession” has been used among financial circles for at least the last 100 years. As early as 1917, a report in the Vancouver Sun noted that the auto sector was experiencing “technical recessions” as a result of U.S. entry into the First World War.

    Article content

    But it’s only been within the last few decades that “technical recession” has entered heavy usage within the Canadian political lexicon as politicians began litigating economic contractions based on fractions of a per cent.

    Article content

    The first recorded mention of “technical recession” in the House of Commons was in 1990 by Geoff Wilson, minister of finance under then prime minister Brian Mulroney. When the Liberal opposition accused Wilson of what he called the “r-word,” Wilson replied, “If there is that decline in output in the current quarter then we would have a technical recession.”

    Article content

    In the midst of the 2008 Great Recession, then prime minister Stephen Harper used the term “technical recession” to describe Canada’s relatively mild experience of the downturn.

    Article content

    Article content

    Harper’s final months in office would come to be characterized by two consecutive quarters of decline driven in part by plummeting oil prices, leading to years of Liberal claims that they took power amidst a “technical recession.”

    Article content

    “When we took office in 2015, the Canadian economy was sluggish, and Canada was in a technical recession,” Liberal MP Joël Lightbound said in one typical 2019 statement to the House of Commons.

  • US: Job openings in April surged to 7.6 million, the highest in nearly two years

    • The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that available employment hit 7.6 million for April, a surge of 731,000 from the prior month and the highest level since May 2024.
    • While openings jumped, the hiring rate slipped. Companies hired a total 5.12 million workers during the month, a decline of 419,000 from March.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/02/job-openings-april-2026.html

  • Oil jumps more than 4% as Trump tells CNBC he doesn’t care if Iran negotiations are over

    • President Donald Trump told CNBC’s Eamon Javers in a phone interview that he doesn’t care if talks with Iran are over.
    • Iranian state media reported earlier that Tehran will halt talks with the U.S. in response to Israeli attacks in Lebanon.
    • Trump subsequently posted on social media that talks with Iran are continuing.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/01/oil-prices-wti-brent-crude-israel-lebanon-hezbollah-iran-trump-us.html

  • Provinces that receive equlization payments

    The Canadian provinces currently receiving equalization payments (for 2025–26 and 2026–27 fiscal years) are:

    • Quebec (by far the largest recipient, ~$13.9 billion for 2026–27)
    • Manitoba (~$5.0 billion)
    • Nova Scotia (~$3.5 billion)
    • New Brunswick (~$3.3 billion)
    • Prince Edward Island (~$723 million)
    • Ontario (smaller amount, around $400 million)
    • Newfoundland and Labrador (smaller amount, around $180–200 million)

    Key Notes

    • These are the seven “have-not” provinces that qualify based on the federal formula, which measures fiscal capacity (ability to generate revenue from taxes like personal income, corporate, and sales taxes).
    • Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan do not receive equalization payments, as they are considered “have” provinces with stronger fiscal capacity (mainly due to natural resources).
    • Equalization is an unconditional federal transfer meant to help less wealthy provinces provide reasonably comparable public services at reasonably comparable tax rates. The total program is around $26–27 billion annually.

    Amounts can change slightly year to year based on economic data, but the list of recipient provinces has been stable in recent years (with Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador receiving smaller/occasional amounts)

  • June 1: Oil prices rise as U.S., Iran trade strikes, Israel moves further into Lebanon

    Oil prices rose more than 3 per cent on Monday ​after Iran and the U.S. traded strikes ‌and Israel ordered troops to move further into Lebanon in its battle with Tehran-backed Hezbollah.

    Brent futures were up US$2.68 or 3 per cent at US$93.80 a barrel at 7:21 a.m. ET. U.S. ​crude futures rose US$3.03 or 3.5 per cent to US$90.39 a barrel.

    Over May, Brent and WTI lost around 19 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively. It was both contracts’ biggest monthly fall in absolute terms since March 2020 when the ​coronavirus pandemic slashed energy demand.

    The fighting in ‌the Middle East, after Washington hosted Israel-Lebanon peace talks on Friday, dimmed hopes that the U.S. and Iran could soon announce an extension to their ceasefire.

    U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would soon decide on a proposed ‌deal to ​extend a ceasefire announced ‌in early April.

    Israel would be key to any such deal, and ​Iran has said repeatedly that Hezbollah and Lebanon ⁠must be included. The U.S. has proposed a “gradual de-escalation” plan, ⁠a U.S. official said on Sunday.

    Concerns are rising about mines in the Strait of ​Hormuz, a key oil and gas shipping lane, IG analyst Tony Sycamore said in a note. “Even if an agreement is reached, it won’t deliver a flood of supply,” Sycamore said.

    An Axios reporter said on X on Friday that Iran had dropped ⁠more mines in the strait earlier last week.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Monday the delay in the diplomatic process to end the war can be explained by a lack of trust, Washington’s contradictory positions and Israel’s attacks on Lebanon.

    Concerns over supply outweighed weekend ⁠economic data from China which showed stalling factory ​activity. This added to concerns the world’s second-largest economy is losing momentum.

    Saudi ⁠Arabia is likely to cut its official selling prices (OSPs) for crude oil to Asia in July ‌for a second month, a Reuters survey showed.

    Goldman Sachs said on Sunday that ​weak oil demand in China and Europe poses a major downside risk to its fourth-quarter Brent crude forecast of US$90 a barrel and WTI forecast of US$83, although Middle East supply disruptions could still ​push prices higher.

  • TSX Outlook — Week Ending June 5, 2026

    1. Economic Events To Watch

    A. U.S. Non-Farm Payrolls (Friday, June 5)

    Highest impact event of the week.

    Why it matters:

    • Determines expectations for Federal Reserve policy.
    • Influences bond yields.
    • Impacts risk appetite globally.
    • Often drives TSX direction for several days.

    TSX Impact

    If Jobs StrongIf Jobs Weak
    Banks ↑Utilities ↑
    Industrials ↑Gold ↑
    Technology ↑REITs ↑
    Gold ↓Bond-sensitive sectors ↑

    Stocks most sensitive:

    • Royal Bank of Canada
    • Toronto-Dominion Bank
    • Shopify
    • Kinaxis

    B. Canadian Labour Market

    The labour market remains a concern.

    Recent data showed:

    • rising unemployment,
    • slowing hiring,
    • weaker employment growth.

    TSX Impact

    Positive:

    • Supports lower interest rates.

    Negative:

    • Signals weaker consumer spending.
    • Negative for discretionary retailers.

    Watch:

    • Canadian Tire Corporation
    • Loblaw Companies
    • Alimentation Couche-Tard

    C. Bank of Canada Expectations

    Markets increasingly expect the Bank of Canada to remain cautious after weak GDP data. The next BoC meeting is June 10, so investors will be positioning ahead of it all week.

    Beneficiaries

    • Banks
    • Utilities
    • REITs
    • Telecoms

    2. Geopolitical Events To Watch

    A. USMCA Trade Negotiations

    The U.S. and Mexico have begun discussions on revisions to USMCA, with Canada expected to be drawn into negotiations over the coming weeks. Automotive content rules, steel, aluminum and supply chains are key issues.

    TSX Exposure

    Most exposed:

    • Canadian National Railway
    • Canadian Pacific Kansas City
    • Magna International

    Bullish:

    • Constructive negotiations.

    Bearish:

    • New tariff threats.

    B. Middle East / Oil

    Markets continue to monitor:

    • Iran developments,
    • Strait of Hormuz shipping,
    • ceasefire implementation.

    Recent progress on a ceasefire reduced oil prices, but risks remain elevated.

    TSX Impact

    If oil > US$95:

    • Energy sector likely leads.

    If oil < US$85:

    • Energy underperforms.
    • Consumer and transportation sectors benefit.

    Watch:

    • Canadian Natural Resources
    • Suncor Energy
    • Imperial Oil
    • Enbridge

    C. China Economic Data

    Manufacturing PMI releases from China are important for commodity demand expectations. Weak data would pressure industrial metals and resource names.

    TSX Impact

    Affected sectors:

    • Copper
    • Base metals
    • Materials

    Watch:

    • Teck Resources
    • First Quantum Minerals
    • Lundin Mining

    TSX Sector Scorecard For The Week

    SectorOutlook
    GoldBullish
    UtilitiesBullish
    TelecomBullish
    BanksNeutral to Bullish
    EnergyNeutral (oil dependent)
    Consumer StaplesNeutral
    Consumer DiscretionaryNeutral to Bearish
    IndustrialsTrade-headline dependent
    TechnologyU.S. jobs dependent
    MaterialsChina-data dependent

    Key Levels To Watch

    TSX Composite

    • Resistance: ~35,000
    • Major Resistance: ~35,500
    • Support: ~34,250
    • Major Support: ~33,750

    WTI Crude

    • Bullish above: US$90
    • Strongly bullish above: US$95

    Gold

    • Bullish above: US$4,400/oz
    • Strong breakout above: US$4,500/oz

    Most Important TSX Catalysts This Week (Ranked)

    1. U.S. Non-Farm Payrolls (June 5)
    2. Middle East / Oil developments
    3. USMCA / tariff headlines
    4. China PMI data
    5. Bank of Canada rate expectations ahead of June 10 meeting

    Base Case (60% Probability)

    • TSX trades sideways to modestly higher.
    • Gold remains firm.
    • Banks stabilize.
    • Energy consolidates.
    • Investors position cautiously ahead of the June 10 Bank of Canada decision.

  • Economic Calendar: June 1 – June 5

    Monday June 1

    China’s PMI

    Japan’s capital spending and manufacturing PMI

    Euro zone’s unemployment rate, private sector credit and manufacturing PMI

    Germany’s retail sales

    (9:30 a.m. ET) Canada’s S&P Global Manufacturing PMI for May.

    (9:45 a.m. ET) U.S. S&P Global Manufacturing PMI for May.

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. ISM Manufacturing PMI for May.

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. construction spending for April. The Street expects a month-over-month increase of 0.2 per cent.

    (12 p.m. ET) Bank of Canada Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers appears before the House Standing Committee on Public Accounts.

    Earnings include: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.


    Tuesday June 2

    Euro zone’s CPI

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey for April.

    Earnings include: Dollar General Corp.; Palo Alto Networks Inc.


    Wednesday June 3

    China, Japan and Euro zone’s services and composite PMI

    (8:15 a.m. ET) U.S. ADP National Employment Report for May.

    (8:30 a.m. ET) Canadian labour productivity for Q1.

    (9 a.m. ET) Canada’s S&P Global Services PMI for May.

    (9:45 a.m. ET) U.S. Global Services/Composite PMI for May.

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. ISM Services PMI for May.

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. factory orders for April.

    (2 p.m. ET) U.S. Beige Book is released.

    Earnings include: Broadcom Inc.; CrowdStrike Holdings Inc.; Descartes Systems Group Inc.; Kraken Robotics Inc.; Macy’s Inc.; Medtronic PLC


    Thursday June 4

    Euro zone’s retail sales.

    (8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. initial jobless claims for week of May 30. Estimate is 212,000, down 3,000 from the previous week.

    (8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. productivity and unit labour costs for Q1. Analysts are projecting annualized rate rises of 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent, respectively.

    (10 a.m. ET) U.S. Global Supply Chain Pressure Index for May.

    Earnings include: Enghouse Systems Ltd.; Saputo Inc.


    Friday June 5

    Japan’s real cash earnings and household spending

    Euro zone’s real GDP

    (8:30 a.m. ET) Canadian employment for May. The Street expects a gain of 10,000 jobs with the unemployment rate remaining 6.9 per cent and average hourly wages rising 4.5 per cent year-over-year (unchanged from the previous month).

    (8:30 a.m. ET) U.S. nonfarm payrolls for May. Consensus is a rise of 92,000 jobs with a steady unemployment rate of 4.3 per cent and average hourly wages gaining 3.5 per cent from the same period a year ago.

    (3 p.m. ET) U.S. consumer credit for April.

  • May 29: L.TO trading with TTCS & TSX over past 5 days?

    Executive Summary

    • L.TO has traded largely in line with TTCS over the past 5 trading days because Loblaw is one of the largest constituents of the Consumer Staples sector.
    • L.TO slightly outperformed the broader TSX on a risk-adjusted basis, benefiting from continued investor demand for defensive stocks.
    • Investors continue to favor Loblaw’s grocery, pharmacy, discount-banner, and private-label businesses amid economic uncertainty.
    • Unlike Energy and Materials stocks, L.TO is driven primarily by earnings stability and cash-flow visibility rather than commodity prices.

    Why L.TO and TTCS Moved Together

    Loblaw is effectively a bellwether for the Consumer Staples sector in Canada.

    Key positives supporting both L.TO and TTCS:

    • Defensive earnings profile.
    • Stable grocery demand.
    • Continued strength at discount banners such as No Frills.
    • Strong pharmacy business through Shoppers Drug Mart.
    • Private-label brands supporting margins.

    As a result, when investors rotate toward safety, both TTCS and L.TO tend to rise together.


    Relative Performance vs TSX

    The TSX has recently been driven by:

    • Gold stocks
    • Energy producers
    • Large-cap technology names

    When those sectors lead, defensive names like Loblaw often lag on strong market-up days but hold up better during pullbacks.


    What Investors Are Focusing On

    Positive DriversRisks
    Grocery demand remains resilientValuation higher than historical average
    Shoppers Drug Mart growthRevenue growth moderating
    Strong cash flowCompetitive grocery pricing
    Discount-banner strengthConsumer spending remains cautious

    Bottom Line

    Over the past 5 days, L.TO has traded very similarly to TTCS and has generally held up well against the TSX. The market continues to view Loblaw as one of Canada’s premier defensive stocks. While Energy and Gold stocks may generate larger short-term moves, investors continue to reward Loblaw’s predictable earnings, grocery market leadership, and pharmacy exposure.

    Next Catalysts to Watch

    1. Food inflation trends.
    2. Same-store sales growth.
    3. Shoppers Drug Mart performance.
    4. Consumer spending data in Canada.
    5. Q2 earnings guidance.

    A sustained improvement in consumer confidence would likely help the TSX more broadly, while continued economic uncertainty would tend to favor L.TO and the broader TTCS sector.

  • May 29: Why Has ATD.TO Underperformed TTCS and the TSX Over the Past 5 Days?

    Executive Summary

    • Yes, ATD.TO has modestly underperformed both the TSX Composite and the TSX Consumer Staples Index (TTCS) over the past week.
    • The primary reason is company-specific concerns, not a deterioration in the defensive retail sector.
    • Investors remain cautious following weaker fuel-volume trends and softer consumer spending trends discussed in recent earnings reports.
    • Other Consumer Staples names have benefited from a rotation into defensive sectors, while ATD faces additional uncertainty regarding growth and execution.
    • There has been no major positive catalyst for ATD in recent days, causing capital to flow toward stronger-performing staples stocks.

    Key Reasons

    1. Fuel Volumes Remain a Concern

    ATD’s earnings have recently been affected by lower fuel demand and weaker traffic volumes. U.S. same-store fuel volumes declined, reflecting reduced travel activity and cautious consumer behaviour.

    For Couche-Tard:

    • Fuel sales remain ~60%+ of revenue.
    • Small changes in fuel volumes can significantly impact earnings expectations.
    • Investors remain concerned that fuel demand growth may stay muted through summer.

    2. Consumer Spending Is Still Soft

    Couche-Tard generates profits from:

    • Convenience-store purchases
    • Prepared foods
    • Beverages
    • Fuel

    Management has previously noted that lower- and middle-income consumers remain value conscious and are limiting discretionary purchases.

    This is a greater concern for ATD than for many TTCS constituents.


    3. Lack of a Near-Term Catalyst

    Over the past week:

    • No major acquisition announcement.
    • No earnings surprise.
    • No analyst upgrades.

    Meanwhile investors have been favouring stocks with clearer earnings momentum.


    4. TTCS Has Been Led by Stronger Staples Names

    The TSX Consumer Staples Index has recently been supported by companies such as:

    • Loblaw Companies
    • Empire Company
    • Metro Inc.
    • Dollarama

    These businesses are viewed as direct beneficiaries of:

    • Food inflation
    • Value-seeking consumers
    • Stable recurring demand

    ATD has some defensive characteristics but remains more exposed to fuel demand cycles.


    What the Market Is Saying

    Current investor sentiment appears to be:

    Positive FactorsNegative Factors
    Strong balance sheetSlowing fuel volumes
    Global footprintSoft consumer spending
    Food-service growthRecent EPS misses
    Acquisition capacityLack of immediate catalyst

    Analysts generally remain constructive longer term because of ATD’s strong cash flow, food-service expansion, and acquisition capability. However, the market currently wants evidence of renewed earnings growth before rewarding the stock with a higher valuation.


    Bottom Line

    The recent underperformance versus TTCS and the TSX is mainly due to:

    1. Concerns about fuel-volume growth.
    2. Continued pressure on discretionary consumer spending.
    3. No major positive catalyst during the past week.
    4. Investors favouring grocery and discount-retail names such as Dollarama and Loblaw.

    For the next 1–3 months, the most important drivers for ATD will be:

    • Same-store merchandise sales.
    • Fuel-margin trends.
    • Food-service growth.
    • Any strategic acquisitions or capital allocation announcements.

    If fuel volumes stabilize and food-service growth continues, ATD could begin closing the performance gap versus TTCS.