Canadian Tire Class A Non-Voting Shares closed at C$186.09 on June 19, 2026, down 0.29% on the day.
Over the 10-trading-session window from June 5 close to June 19 close, CTC.A rose from C$178.62 to C$186.09.
10D performance: +C$7.47 / +4.18%.
The strongest daily move in the period was June 11: +2.74%, followed by June 12: +1.21%.
Move looks like post-earnings momentum + consumer discretionary recovery/value rotation, not a single-news spike.
Data & Evidence
Date
Close / Price
Daily Move
Comment
Jun 5
C$178.62
+1.37%
Start of 10-session window
Jun 8
C$179.13
+0.29%
Modest continuation
Jun 9
C$180.79
+0.93%
Momentum improving
Jun 10
C$179.62
-0.65%
Pullback
Jun 11
C$184.54
+2.74%
Main breakout day
Jun 12
C$186.77
+1.21%
Follow-through
Jun 15
C$186.31
-0.25%
Consolidation
Jun 16
C$185.94
-0.20%
Flat/slight pullback
Jun 17
C$186.05
+0.06%
Stable
Jun 18
C$186.64
+0.32%
Stable higher
Jun 19
C$186.09
-0.29%
Latest close cited
Sources: Canadian Tire investor stock quote and Fund Library pricing history.
Calculation: C$186.09 ÷ C$178.62 − 1 = +4.18%
Key Drivers
1. Earnings support
Canadian Tire reported Q1 2026 revenue of C$3.57B, up 3.3% YoY, and diluted EPS of C$2.02, compared with C$0.67 reported EPS and C$2.00 normalized EPS in Q1 2025. That gave investors some support that operations were not deteriorating sharply.
2. Retail sentiment improved short-term
The stock had been pressured earlier by weak Canadian consumer concerns. The 10D rise suggests some re-rating as investors looked past near-term retail weakness and focused on stabilization.
3. Dividend/value appeal
At the June 19 quote, Google Finance showed a dividend yield around 3.87%, P/E around 16.77x, and 52-week range of C$158.18–C$202.46. That places the stock above its lows but still below its 52-week high.
Valuation Logic
Metric
Reading
Latest price
C$186.09
52-week high
C$202.46
52-week low
C$158.18
Distance from 52-week high
~8.1% below
Distance from 52-week low
~17.6% above
Approx. dividend yield
~3.9%
The 10D move is positive, but CTC.A is not yet at breakout-to-new-high territory. It is recovering within its 52-week range.
Scenarios — Next 1–3 Months
Scenario
Price Bias
What Drives It
Bull
C$195–202
Better retail sales, rate-cut expectations, continued margin discipline
Base
C$180–195
Stock consolidates after 10D rise; valuation remains fair but not cheap enough for a major rerate
Bear
C$170–180
Weak Canadian consumer spending, disappointing same-store sales, margin pressure
Risks
Canadian consumer spending remains soft.
Weather-sensitive categories can affect seasonal sales.
Financial Services segment is exposed to credit risk.
If rates stay higher for longer, discretionary retail multiples may compress.
A move above C$186 after a fast 10D gain may invite short-term profit taking.
Actionable Takeaways
Trend: Positive short-term momentum.
10D move:+4.18%, mainly driven by June 11–12 strength.
Key level to watch: C$186–187. A sustained hold above this area keeps the short-term trend constructive.
Resistance zone: C$195–202.
Support zone: C$179–181, then C$175–176.
Thesis breaker: renewed weakness below C$179 would suggest the 10D rally has failed.
Dollarama closed at C$186.89 on June 19, 2026, down C$0.96 / -0.51% on the day.
Using the available June price data, DOL.TO was around C$181.22 near the June 5 starting point, implying an approximate 10-trading-day move of +C$5.67 / +3.1%.
The 10D move was not smooth: the stock jumped after Q1 results, then pulled back from the post-earnings high.
Main catalyst: June 11 earnings beat — Q1 sales C$1.85B vs C$1.82B expected, adjusted EPS C$1.05 vs C$0.99 expected.
Valuation remains the key risk: Barchart shows P/E ttm ~38.65x and forward dividend yield only ~0.24%, so the stock is priced as a premium compounder.
Data & Evidence
Item
Value
Approx. start price
~C$181.22
Latest close, Jun 19
C$186.89
10D price change
+C$5.67
Approx. 10D return
+3.1%
Post-earnings high reference
~C$200.99 on Jun 12
Pullback from high to Jun 19
about -7.0%
Data gap: I could verify the Jun 19 close and the June pricing range, but the full daily 10-session table was not fully accessible from Yahoo due to fetch limits. Treat the +3.1% as a close-to-close approximation, not a tick-perfect official return.
Key Drivers
1. Earnings beat drove the spike
Dollarama beat Q1 expectations, with net sales of C$1.85B versus C$1.82B expected, and adjusted EPS of C$1.05 versus C$0.99 expected. Reuters reported that the shares rose about 7% in early trading after the results.
2. Defensive consumer-staples/value appeal
Dollarama benefits when consumers trade down to lower-priced essentials. Reuters cited “sticky inflation” and pressure on household budgets as reasons customers remain focused on value.
3. International growth narrative
The Mexico Dollarcity business and Australia’s The Reject Shop remain part of the growth story. Reuters noted analyst commentary that Mexico and Australia support the view that Dollarama’s model may be portable.
Valuation Logic
Metric
Reading
Latest close
C$186.89
P/E ttm
~38.65x
EPS ttm
~C$4.86
Forward dividend
~C$0.48/year
Forward yield
~0.24%
DOL.TO is not trading as a cheap defensive stock. It is trading as a high-quality growth compounder, so even strong earnings can be followed by profit taking if valuation looks stretched.
Scenarios — Next 1–3 Months
Scenario
Price Bias
What Drives It
Bull
C$195–201
Continued earnings momentum, strong same-store sales, confidence in Australia/Mexico expansion
Base
C$180–190
Stock consolidates after post-earnings spike; valuation caps upside
Bear
C$170–180
Multiple compression, margin pressure, weaker consumer spending, or disappointment in international rollout
Actionable Takeaways
10D trend: Positive, approximately +3%, but the stock has already pulled back from the post-earnings surge.
Support zone: C$181–183.
Resistance zone: C$195–201.
Thesis breaker: failure to hold around C$181 would suggest the earnings rally has faded.
TTCS 10D performance was slightly negative, around -0.65% based on the previously cited index levels.
TTCS should be explained through Loblaw, Alimentation Couche-Tard, George Weston, Metro, and Saputo.
The sector’s weakness was more likely due to mixed performance among actual staples constituents, valuation pressure, and broader market weakness.
Key Drivers
1. Sector was defensive but not strongly bid
Consumer staples usually hold up better in weak markets, but TTCS did not materially outperform over this 10-session window. The index rose strongly on June 5, then gave most of that gain back.
2. Loblaw and Couche-Tard weighed on staples sentiment
Simply Wall St.’s Canadian consumer staples sector snapshot showed the sector down over the recent 7-day period, citing a pullback in Alimentation Couche-Tard as a key drag. Loblaw also traded lower on June 19 at C$64.09, -1.04%.
3. Broader TSX weakness hit sentiment
The TSX pulled back on June 17 after the U.S. Federal Reserve signalled higher rates for longer, and it fell again on June 18 as commodity prices weakene
Driver View
Driver
TTCS Impact
Loblaw / George Weston
Grocery defensiveness, pharmacy exposure, and valuation support
Couche-Tard
Convenience retail and fuel-margin sentiment; large index influence
Higher yields can pressure defensive, higher-multiple staples
Canadian consumer pressure
Staples demand is resilient, but margin and basket-size trends still matter
TTCS was slightly negative over the past 10 trading days, despite defensive characteristics, because its actual constituents — mainly L, ATD, WN, MRU, and SAP — did not provide enough upside momentum.
ATD.TO closed at C$82.37 on June 19, 2026, down C$0.07 / -0.08% on the day.
Over the 10-trading-day window from June 5 close to June 19 close, ATD moved from C$82.60 to C$82.37.
10D performance: -C$0.23 / -0.28%.
The stock rose early in the period, reaching C$84.35 on June 11, then faded to C$82.37 by June 19.
Main short-term issue: consolidation ahead of Q4/FY2026 results, scheduled for June 22, 2026 after TSX close.
Data & Evidence
Date
Close
Daily Move
Jun 5
C$82.60
+2.24%
Jun 8
C$81.61
-1.20%
Jun 9
C$82.33
+0.88%
Jun 10
C$83.43
+1.34%
Jun 11
C$84.35
+1.10%
Jun 12
C$84.31
-0.05%
Jun 15
C$84.24
-0.08%
Jun 16
C$83.46
-0.93%
Jun 17
C$83.62
+0.19%
Jun 18
C$82.44
-1.41%
Jun 19
C$82.37
-0.08%
Source: Fund Library pricing history.
Calculation: C$82.37 ÷ C$82.60 − 1 = -0.28%
Key Drivers
1. Short-term consolidation after early strength
ATD gained from C$82.60 on June 5 to C$84.35 on June 11, a rise of about +2.1%, but then gave back the move into June 19. That suggests the 10D performance was flat-to-slightly negative, not a sustained breakout.
2. Earnings event risk
Couche-Tard is scheduled to release Q4 and fiscal 2026 results on June 22, 2026 after market close, with the conference call on June 23. That likely kept investors cautious into the reporting date.
3. TTCS impact
ATD.TO is a major consumer staples / convenience retail name, so its flat-to-negative 10D move likely contributed to the muted TTCS performance. Unlike Dollarama, ATD belongs in the TTCS discussion.
Loblaw Companies Ltd. closed at C$64.09 on June 19, 2026, down C$0.67 / -1.03% on the day.
Over the 10-trading-day window from June 5 to June 19, L.TO moved from C$65.53 to C$64.09.
10D performance: -C$1.44 / -2.20%.
The stock rose to C$66.68 on June 11, then sold off sharply on June 12, falling -2.52%.
The move was not business-collapse driven; it looks more like profit-taking / valuation consolidation after a strong June 5–11 rebound.
Data & Evidence
Date
Close
Daily Move
Jun 5
C$65.53
+3.62%
Jun 8
C$64.73
-1.22%
Jun 9
C$66.30
+2.43%
Jun 10
C$66.47
+0.26%
Jun 11
C$66.68
+0.32%
Jun 12
C$65.00
-2.52%
Jun 15
C$64.59
-0.63%
Jun 16
C$64.88
+0.45%
Jun 17
C$64.69
-0.29%
Jun 18
C$64.76
+0.11%
Jun 19
C$64.09
-1.03%
Source: Investing.com historical data for Loblaw Companies Ltd.
Calculation: C$64.09 ÷ C$65.53 − 1 = -2.20%
Key Drivers
1. Reversal after early strength
L.TO rallied from C$65.53 on June 5 to C$66.68 on June 11, then declined to C$64.09 by June 19. That means the stock gave back the early 10D gain and finished the period lower.
2. Defensive business, but valuation still matters
Loblaw’s business fundamentals remain defensive. In Q1 2026, the company reported revenue of C$14.724B, up 4.2% YoY, Food Retail same-store sales +2.4%, and Drug Retail same-store sales +4.1%. However, defensive stocks can still decline when investors rotate, take profits, or question valuation after a strong run.
3. Earnings were solid, but not enough for a breakout
Q1 adjusted diluted EPS rose 10.6% YoY to C$0.52, and retail operating income rose 20.5% YoY. The issue is that the market may already be pricing in Loblaw’s stable earnings profile, so the stock needed either stronger guidance or a broader defensive-sector bid to keep moving higher.
4. TTCS relevance
Unlike DOL.TO, Loblaw is part of TTCS. Its -2.20% 10D move likely contributed to TTCS’s slightly negative performance over the same period.
Valuation / Positioning
Metric
Reading
Latest close
C$64.09
10D change
-C$1.44
10D return
-2.20%
10D high close
C$66.68
Pullback from 10D high
-3.88%
52-week range
C$52.92–C$69.59
L.TO remains closer to the upper half of its 52-week range, so short-term pullbacks can occur even when fundamentals remain intact.
TTTK = S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index.
Latest close available: 293.05 on June 19, 2026, up 0.30% that day.
Using the standard 5-trading-day close-to-close method, from June 12 close to June 19 close, TTTK fell from 303.83 to 293.05.
5D performance: -10.78 points / -3.55%.
Main issue: Canadian tech gave back prior strength, especially after June 16–18 weakness.
Data & Evidence
Date
TTTK Close
Daily Move
Jun 12
303.83
-0.99%
Jun 15
307.50
+1.21%
Jun 16
303.45
-1.32%
Jun 17
299.67
-1.25%
Jun 18
292.16
-2.51%
Jun 19
293.05
+0.30%
Calculation: 293.05 ÷ 303.83 − 1 = -3.55%
Source: Investing.com historical data for S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index.
Key Drivers
1. Broad tech pullback after prior gains
TTTK rose into June 15, then declined for three straight sessions from June 16 to June 18. The largest drag was June 18: -2.51%.
2. High concentration in a few names
The index is heavily concentrated. XIT, the iShares ETF tracking the same benchmark, lists 19 holdings and a P/E ratio of 44.49x as of June 18, 2026. That means moves in a few large holdings can dominate short-term index performance.
3. Main constituent exposure
BlackRock’s May 31, 2026 XIT fact sheet shows the top holdings as Constellation Software, Celestica, Shopify, CGI, Descartes, Open Text, BlackBerry, Kinaxis, Lightspeed, and Enghouse. The top 10 represented 98.68% of the portfolio, so TTTK is not broadly diversified like the full TSX Composite.
Valuation Logic
Item
Reading
Latest TTTK close
293.05
5D start close
303.83
5D change
-10.78 points
5D return
-3.55%
XIT P/E
44.49x
XIT P/B
6.23x
XIT holdings count
19
At a 44x P/E, the sector is valuation-sensitive. When investors reduce risk exposure or discount rates rise, high-multiple tech typically underperforms.
Scenarios — Next 1–3 Weeks
Scenario
TTTK Bias
What Drives It
Bull
300–308
Shopify / Celestica rebound, U.S. tech strength, lower yields
Base
290–300
Consolidation after recent pullback
Bear
280–290
Continued multiple compression, weak large-cap tech, risk-off TSX trading
Actionable Takeaways
5D trend: negative, -3.55%.
Support zone: 290–292.
Resistance zone: 300–308.
Key driver: performance of the top three holdings — Constellation Software, Celestica, and Shopify.
Thesis breaker: sustained break below 290 would confirm a deeper short-term correction.
Gold futures fell -1.55% over the 5-trading-day window from June 12 to June 19, 2026.
Gold equities outperformed gold itself over the same period: XGD.TO rose +2.82%.
Strongest 5D performers among major TSX gold names: WPM.TO +4.73%, K.TO +4.59%, FNV.TO +3.75%, AEM.TO +2.45%.
Weakest: AGI.TO -5.14%, due to company-specific pressure, and ABX.TO -0.60%.
Key driver: gold stocks rallied early in the week, but gains faded after gold prices dropped on June 18–19 as hawkish Fed signals and a stronger U.S. dollar pressured bullion. Reuters reported that gold was heading for a third straight weekly loss on June 19.
Data & Evidence — 5D Close-to-Close
Period used: June 12 close to June 19 close, 2026.
Asset / Stock
Start Close
Latest Close
5D Change
5D Return
Gold Futures
US$4,238.80
US$4,172.90
-US$65.90
-1.55%
XGD.TO — iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold ETF
C$49.99
C$51.40
+C$1.41
+2.82%
FNV.TO — Franco-Nevada
C$293.33
C$304.32
+C$10.99
+3.75%
AEM.TO — Agnico Eagle
C$227.41
C$232.99
+C$5.58
+2.45%
WPM.TO — Wheaton Precious Metals
C$162.32
C$170.00
+C$7.68
+4.73%
ABX.TO — Barrick Mining
C$56.25
C$55.91
-C$0.34
-0.60%
K.TO — Kinross Gold
C$35.76
C$37.40
+C$1.64
+4.59%
AGI.TO — Alamos Gold
C$49.19
C$46.66
-C$2.53
-5.14%
Gold futures historical data shows June 12 at US$4,238.80 and June 19 at US$4,172.90. XGD.TO historical data shows C$49.99 on June 12 and C$51.40 on June 19. AEM.TO, WPM.TO, ABX.TO, K.TO, AGI.TO and FNV.TO figures are from TSX historical price data.
Key Drivers
1. Gold price was negative over 5 days
Gold started the period with a strong rebound on June 12–16, but the move reversed into June 18–19. Investing.com shows gold futures falling from US$4,381.40 on June 17 to US$4,245.90 on June 18, then to US$4,172.90 on June 19.
2. Fed and U.S. dollar pressure
Reuters reported that gold declined as the U.S. dollar strengthened and the Federal Reserve outlook turned more hawkish. Higher expected rates hurt gold because bullion does not pay interest.
3. Gold stocks outperformed the metal
Despite gold futures falling -1.55%, XGD.TO rose +2.82%. That means gold equities had positive short-term beta from the earlier rally, helped by investor rotation into miners before the late-week gold selloff.
4. Stock-specific divergence mattered
AGI.TO was the clear outlier at -5.14%. Its decline was not simply a gold-price move; StockAnalysis listed fresh news around operational disruption and reduced production outlook for Alamos.
Valuation / Market Logic
Observation
Interpretation
Gold down, miners up
Miners were still benefiting from earlier-week rebound and operating leverage
XGD +2.82% vs gold -1.55%
Equity beta was positive, but vulnerable if gold keeps falling
FNV/WPM strong
Royalty/streaming names held up better than many producers
Current reference price: WTI was around US$77.54/bbl intraday on June 19, 2026, after falling sharply from above US$80 earlier in the week.
Base case, next 1–2 weeks:US$74–82/bbl, assuming Hormuz traffic continues but remains politically fragile.
Bull case:US$85–95/bbl if Iran’s closure threat becomes operationally real, insurance rates spike, or tanker traffic materially slows.
Bear case:US$68–74/bbl if U.S.–Iran talks stabilize, stranded Gulf barrels move quickly, and the market prices in surplus risk.
The key variable is not demand; it is shipping reliability through the Strait of Hormuz, which handles roughly 20% of global oil and LNG supply. Reuters reported that U.S. Central Command disputed Iran’s closure claim and said 55 merchant ships carrying more than 17 million barrels of oil transited the Strait on Saturday.
Base Forecast
Timeframe
WTI Forecast Range
Bias
Reason
Next week
US$74–82/bbl
Volatile / range-bound
Hormuz traffic continues, but political risk premium remains
1 month
US$72–85/bbl
Wide range
Depends on whether stranded Gulf supply clears smoothly
3 months
US$68–82/bbl
Mild downside bias
More supply returning could pressure prices unless disruption resumes
Base case is not a straight collapse because inventories are tight. Reuters reported that U.S. crude stocks dropped to their lowest level since 1985, while the EIA warned that OECD oil inventories were headed toward their lowest levels since at least 2003.
Key Drivers
1. Geopolitical risk: still high, but not fully priced as closure
Iran said it closed the Strait of Hormuz, but the U.S. disputed that claim and reported continued commercial transit. That means the market is likely pricing a risk premium, not a full blockade. A real closure would move WTI materially higher.
2. Oil flows are restarting, but not normal
Reuters reported that at least four tankers entered Hormuz on June 19, and analysts expected the deal to release more than 85 million barrels of stranded oil into global markets. That is bearish for oil if the barrels move smoothly.
3. Inventories remain the bullish offset
Even with peace-deal hopes, inventories are tight. The EIA said global stock draws were severe because of lost Middle Eastern output, and Reuters reported the EIA expected oil prices to remain elevated until flows normalize and inventories rebuild.
4. Forward supply risk is bearish
Reuters reported the IEA sees global supply significantly overtaking demand next year, and Citi’s base case expects oil markets to move into surplus with prices trending lower over 6–12 months.
CNQ, SU, IMO, CVE benefit; airlines and consumer discretionary pressured
WTI US$74–82
Neutral to mildly positive
Energy stable; pipelines less sensitive than producers
WTI US$68–74
Negative for producers
Energy sector underperforms; inflation relief helps rate-sensitive sectors
What Would Disprove the Base Case
The base case of US$74–82 WTI would be wrong if either of these happens:
Trigger
Forecast Change
Verified tanker stoppage through Hormuz
Move forecast toward US$85–95+
U.S.–Iran talks produce enforceable transit rules and exports resume quickly
Move forecast toward US$68–74
U.S. crude inventories keep falling despite resumed Gulf flows
Holds WTI above US$80
Brent/WTI both break below recent support on heavy volume
Confirms bear case
Bottom Line
WTI’s near-term fair range is US$74–82/bbl. The market is balancing two opposing forces: tight inventories and Hormuz risk are bullish, while resumed tanker traffic, possible Iranian supply, and surplus concerns are bearish. A verified Strait disruption is the clearest upside shock; a smooth reopening is the clearest downside trigger.
Canada CPI for May is the key domestic macro event, scheduled for Monday, June 22; this can affect banks, REITs, utilities, telecoms, and rate-sensitive dividend stocks.
U.S. PCE inflation, personal income/spending, Q1 GDP third estimate, durable goods, and jobless claims all land Thursday, June 25, making that the highest-risk macro day for North American equities.
Strait of Hormuz / Iran risk remains the major geopolitical variable for oil, gold, CAD/USD, and TSX energy stocks. Reuters reported conflicting claims: Iran said the Strait was closed, while U.S. Central Command said traffic continued.
Alimentation Couche-Tard reports Q4/FY2026 results on June 22 after market close, relevant to ATD.TO and the TTCS staples index.
TSX trading is open during the week; Canada Day closure is the following week on Wednesday, July 1, 2026.
Key Events & TSX Impact
Date
Event
Why It Matters for TSX
Most Affected Areas
Mon Jun 22
Canada CPI — May 2026
Direct read on inflation and Bank of Canada rate expectations. Hot CPI pressures rate-sensitive sectors; soft CPI supports dividend/defensive names.
Statistics Canada’s 2026 release schedule lists Consumer Price Index for May 2026 on June 22, Investment in building construction for April 2026 on June 22, and Travel between Canada and other countries for April 2026 on June 23.
Statistics Canada also released April retail sales on June 19, showing retail sales increased 0.5% to C$73.0B in April, with an advance estimate suggesting May sales increased 1.0%. That is a useful background input for Canadian consumer names next week, but it is already released data, not a new event next week.
U.S. releases
BEA’s release schedule shows Personal Income and Outlays for May 2026 on June 25 at 8:30 a.m., which includes PCE inflation. The BEA PCE page shows the prior April 2026 PCE inflation reading at +3.8% YoY, with the next release on June 25.
The U.S. Census durable goods schedule lists the May 2026 advance durable goods report for June 25, 2026 at 8:30 a.m.
Negative energy short-term; positive consumer/rate-sensitive sectors
ATD earnings beat
Supports TTCS and defensive staples
Positive ATD, TTCS
ATD earnings miss / weak guidance
Staples drag increases
Negative ATD, TTCS
Valuation Logic
The TSX is vulnerable to rate and commodity shocks because its sector mix is concentrated in financials, energy, materials, industrials, and dividend-sensitive defensives. The most important valuation variable next week is not a single earnings multiple; it is the direction of bond yields, oil, gold, and CAD/USD.
Input
Valuation Effect
Higher Canadian CPI
Higher discount rates; lower multiples for defensives and REITs
Higher U.S. PCE
Stronger USD, higher yields; pressure on gold and tech multiples
Higher oil from Hormuz risk
Energy cash-flow expectations rise; inflation risk also rises
Lower oil from reopening/supply normalization
Energy earnings expectations weaken; consumer inflation pressure eases
Strong ATD results
Supports premium valuation in staples
Weak ATD guidance
Pressure on TTCS multiple
Scenarios for TSX Next Week
Scenario
TSX Bias
Conditions
Bull
TSX grinds higher
Canada CPI and U.S. PCE come in softer; Hormuz remains open; oil stabilizes without inflation shock; ATD results support staples
Base
Choppy / range-bound
CPI/PCE roughly in line; oil headlines remain noisy; TSX rotates between energy, gold, banks, and defensives
Bear
TSX pulls back
Hot inflation data; stronger USD; yields rise; Hormuz risk escalates; oil spike revives inflation fears and pressures non-energy sectors
What Would Disprove the Base Case
The base case is range-bound, headline-driven trading. It would be disproved by any of the following:
Trigger
Interpretation
Canada CPI meaningfully above expectations
BoC easing hopes weaken
U.S. PCE above expectations
Fed-cut expectations weaken; global equities pressure
Verified Hormuz disruption
Oil shock becomes dominant TSX driver
Brent crude spikes sharply and holds
Energy leads, but broader TSX may weaken on inflation risk
Gold fails while yields rise
Gold miners lose defensive support
ATD breaks lower after earnings
TTCS weakness deepens
Actionable Takeaways
Most important day:Thursday, June 25 because of U.S. PCE, GDP, durable goods, income/spending, and jobless claims.
Most important Canadian release:Canada CPI on Monday, June 22.
Most important TSX stock event:ATD.TO earnings after close on June 22.
Most important geopolitical variable:Strait of Hormuz / Iran shipping risk.
Sectors to monitor closely: energy, gold miners, banks, REITs, utilities, consumer staples, and tech.
