Category: Uncategorized

  • U.S. weekly jobless claims rise more than expected; labour market remains stable

    The number of Americans filing claims for unemployment benefits increased more than expected last week, but the underlying trend remained consistent with a stable labour market.

    Initial claims for state unemployment benefits rose 13,000 to a seasonally adjusted 225,000 for the week ended May 30, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 213,000 claims for the latest week. The four-week moving average of claims increased only 6,500 to 214,750.

    Despite high-profile job cuts by technology firms related to the adoption of artificial intelligence, layoffs have remained low, confining claims to a 190,000-230,000 range this year.

    U.S.-based employers announced 97,006 job cuts in May, about 39 per cent of them in the technology sector, a separate report from global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas showed on Thursday. That was up 16 per cent from April. Still planned job cuts rose only 3 per cent compared to the same period last year.

    Though the Middle East conflict has yet to make a noticeable impact on the labour market, uncertainty is growing. The U.S.-Israel war with Iran, now in its fourth month, has severely disrupted the supply of commodities and boosted prices of goods including energy, aluminum and fertilizers.

    The Federal Reserve’s Beige Book report on Wednesday said employment showed “little to no change” in May, and that “most districts described a low-hire, low-fire environment.” It added that “hiring remained selective and primarily focused on critical roles or attrition replacement.” Low layoffs are anchoring the labour market. The number of people receiving unemployment benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, fell 8,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.777 million during the week ended May 23, the claims report showed.

    The claims data have no bearing on the closely watched employment report for May, due to be released on Friday, as they fall outside the survey period.

    Non-farm payrolls likely rose by 85,000 jobs in May after rising 115,000 in April, a Reuters survey of economists predicted. The unemployment rate is forecast unchanged at 4.3 per cent. The Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, or JOLTS report, on Tuesday showed hiring decreased and layoffs fell in April, suggesting the increase in payrolls that month was due to lower layoffs.

  • TFSA Contribution Limit

    Introduced in 2009, the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) is available to Canadian residents age 18 or older. In addition to cash, a TFSA can hold several other investments such as bonds, stocks, and mutual funds. Any interest income, dividends or capital gains earned in the account are not taxed and withdrawals can be made tax-free. There is an annual TFSA contribution limit of $7,000 for 2026, and any unused contributions from one year can be carried forward to the next year. Your contribution room, the maximum amount you can deposit to your TFSA, consists of the current year’s contribution limit, any unused contribution room that you have accumulated from previous years and the total value of withdrawals made in the previous year. Any contribution made to a TFSA beyond the maximum amount is considered an over-contribution, and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) will charge a penalty of 1 per cent per month on the excess contribution until it is withdrawn.

    Interested in how others have invested in their tax-free savings accounts? Check out our TFSA Trouncers series.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/personal-finance/tools/tfsa-limit

  • Carney attributes ‘weakness’ in economic data to lower immigration targets

    Prime Minister Mark Carney responded Tuesday to a report showing the Canadian economy has contracted for two consecutive quarters, saying part of the “weakness” is linked to the government’s decision to scale back immigration.

    He said Ottawa’s plans to boost investment will ultimately produce a “stronger, more resilient economy,” but that economic data will be “uneven” in the interim.

    “You have these cross currents as the economy is being fundamentally transformed. We’re going to continue to work. We’re making progress, but there’s more to be done,” he said.

    Mr. Carney’s comments are his first about Statistics Canada’s quarterly GDP report, published last Friday, which said the Canadian economy contracted by 0.1 per cent on an annualized basis in the first quarter of the year. That is after a 1-per-cent annualized decline in gross domestic product in the previous quarter.

    Two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth is sometimes referred to as a “technical recession,” although many economists dismiss the term. A recession is generally marked by a significant decline in economic output that affects a broad range of industries and lasts for at least several months.

    Canada’s economy stalls, posting consecutive quarterly declines

    Economists on Bay Street say it is premature to determine whether Canada has fallen into a recession – not only because the first-quarter decline was small, but because Statscan often revises GDP figures at a later date.

    Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has seized on the term, however, using it repeatedly on Parliament Hill. After Mr. Carney made his comments to reporters Tuesday morning on his way into a cabinet meeting, Mr. Poilievre appeared before that same gathering of journalists outside the cabinet room to again highlight the economic figures.

    The Conservative Leader accused the Prime Minister of “hiding” from reporters since last Friday’s Statscan report.

    “You asked him point blank: ‘Are we in a recession?’ and he refused to answer that question. Five days have gone by. The Prime Minister has been in hiding from this devastating economic report. And when he does finally appear, he can’t even answer a basic yes or no question,” he said.

    USMCA should be renewed for 16 years, LeBlanc writes to U.S. and Mexico

    While economists aren’t convinced Canada is in a recession, there is no question economic growth effectively stalled through the end of 2025 and beginning of 2026. And it has struggled to make headway over the past year in the face of aggressive U.S. trade policy, contracting in three of the past four quarters.

    U.S. tariffs on autos, industrial metals and wood products are hammering exports while uncertainty about the review of the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement is smothering business investment. Unemployment is elevated at 6.9 per cent and the housing market remains in a slump.

    The first-quarter GDP numbers showed consumer spending continues to be relatively robust, but overall “domestic demand” declined 0.4 per cent on an annualized basis in the quarter. A drop in government spending on weapons systems and a large jump in imports, which get subtracted from the GDP tally if they exceed exports, also contributed to the fall in GDP.

    Topline GDP numbers are also being held back by the country’s declining population – a fact Mr. Carney pointed to in his comments to reporters.

    After criticism of the impact of high immigration targets on Canada’s housing and labour markets, the Liberal government under former prime minister Justin Trudeau announced plans in the fall of 2024 to gradually reduce permanent resident admissions and restrict the number of temporary residents.

    Canada reports first annual population decline on record

    Earlier this year, Statscan reported that Canada’s population declined in 2025 by more than 100,000 people, marking the first annual decline in records that date back to the 1940s.

    In a recent research note about Friday’s GDP data, three National Bank economists said immigration policy is a “key variable” weighing on growth.

    “Due to the ongoing slowdown in immigration decided by Ottawa, the country’s population was smaller in the first quarter of 2026 than in the fourth quarter of 2025. This means that real GDP per capita growth was largely positive (+0.9 per cent) in the last quarter and has been on an upward trend for two years,” wrote economists Taylor Schleich, Matthieu Arseneau and Alexandra Ducharme.

    The economists were among those who said the small quarterly decline could easily be revised later.

    “To be clear, the Canadian economy remains fragile and faces elevated uncertainty in the coming months,” they wrote. “But we are not ready to bandy about the ‘R’ word, at least not yet.”

    There is no formal definition of a recession. Two quarters of declining GDP can be a useful rule of thumb, but it’s not a hard and fast rule.

    The Canadian economy only contracted for two months at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the downturn was so extreme, there was little doubt it constituted a recession.

    By contrast, the C.D. Howe Institute – the unofficial arbiter of recessions in Canada – determined that the two-quarter decline in GDP in 2015, after the drop in global oil prices, did not amount to a recession because the impact was concentrated regionally in Alberta and other oil-producing provinces.

    In a House of Commons committee meeting on Monday, Bank of Canada senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers played down the “technical recession” label.

    She said there was a lot of “noise” in the data, and that the central bank would look at a range of numbers to gauge the state of the economy ahead of its interest rate decision next week.

    “Two quarters of annualized contraction in GDP does meet one definition of a recession,” she said.

    “But you know, simply the fact that you have to put the term ‘technical’ in front of it sort of tells you that you need to really look past that one indicator. You need to look at employment, you maybe need to look at some of the more leading indicators,” she said, pointing to an early estimate from Statscan that GDP rebounded in April.

  • Jun 3 @ 11 AM E.S.T – Dow falls 400 points as oil prices and bond yields creep higher: Live updates

    Stocks fell on Wednesday as oil prices and Treasury yields moved higher amid worries the U.S.-Iran conflict could keep lifting inflation.

    The 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average pulled back 403 points, or 0.8%. The S&P 500 traded down 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite declined 0.5%

    Oil prices rose following the U.S. and Iran launching new strikes. West Texas Intermediate futures rose 1% to around $95 per barrel, while Brent crude gained 1% to around $97 per barrel.

    Late Tuesday, the Kuwait army said in a social media post that air defense systems were “intercepting hostile targets.” U.S. Central Command later said that American forces defeated Iranian ballistic missiles and drones, and they also carried out “self-defense strikes” on Qeshm Island “in response to attempted attacks by Iran across the Middle East.”

    President Donald Trump also said Iran agreed to not having nuclear weapons, but added “they can change their mind.”

    As oil prices gained, U.S. Treasury yields advanced as well, with the 10-year yield last seen approaching 4.5% and the 30-year yield nearing 5%. Yields took a leg higher after the strong ADP report for May.

    Declines in artificial intelligence-related stocks also weighed on the broader market. Nvidia lost more than 2%, while Dell Technologies and Oracle lost 5.5%. Microsoft also shed 2%.

    The major averages notched new record closes on Tuesday. The S&P 500 topped 7,600 for the first time, while the Dow added more than 200 points.

    “The momentum has been incredibly strong. It’s for a lot of good reasons, and a lot of optimism, as well as really strong demand around the AI investment cycles. But still we are moving into a period, sort of moving past earning season, which has been a tremendously positive catalyst for the markets,” Meghan Shue, head of investment strategy at Wilmington Trust, said on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” on Tuesday afternoon. “Now we are left with kind of the summer lull. Trading activity might slow a little bit, and we still have a lot of geopolitical risk on the horizon.”

    “I’m not necessarily calling for a sharp reversion in the market, but I think it makes a lot of sense to see it pause here, or even pull back slightly and introduce a little bit more volatility as we move into the summer months,” Shue added.

  • US: Private payrolls grew by 122,000 in May, stronger than expected, ADP reports

    • ADP reported said companies added 122,000 workers in May, up from 105,000 in April and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 110,000.
    • Unlike prior months, where job growth was concentrated in healthcare and a few other sectors, gains were more broad-based.
    • Education and health services again led with 57,000 hires, but trade, transportation and utilities added 36,000, professional and business services contributed 11,000, and construction and leisure and hospitality both rose by 8,000.

    Private hiring expanded at a brisk pace in May, providing further indication of a stable labor market, ADP reported Wednesday.

    The payrolls processing firm said companies added 122,000 workers for the month, up from 105,000 in April and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 110,000. May marked the strongest month since January 2025. April’s total was revised down by 4,000.

    Unlike prior months, where job growth was concentrated in healthcare and a few other sectors, gains were more broad-based. Eight of the 10 sectors ADP tracks saw gains, and hiring was spread evenly both by company size and geography.

    Education and health services again led with 57,000 hires, but trade, transportation and utilities added 36,000, professional and business services contributed 11,000, and construction and leisure and hospitality both rose by 8,000.

    Information services lost 9,000, a possible impact from artificial intelligence growth, while natural resources and mining also reported a loss, down 3,000.

    “Hiring was more broad-based in May than we’ve seen in the last few years,” said ADP’s chief economist, Nela Richardson. “The labor market continues to show sustained momentum going into the summer hiring season.”

    Companies with fewer than 50 employees led with 67,000 new hires while those with 500 or more added 40,000 and medium-sized firms contributed 17,000.

    On salary, annual pay rose 4.4% for those staying in their jobs, the same as April, while job-switchers saw pay growth edge down to 6.5%.

    Stock market futures were mixed following the release while Treasury yields were higher.

    The report comes two days ahead of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ release of nonfarm payrolls for May. The Wall Street consensus is for growth of 80,000 after April’s 115,000, with the unemployment rate steady at 4.3%.

    Federal Reserve officials will be watching the jobs numbers closely ahead of their June 16-17 policy meeting. Markets are pricing in a virtual certainty that the central bank will hold its benchmark interest rate in a range between 3.5%-3.75%.

  • U.S. plans new levies on dozens of countries, including Canada, as Trump looks to rebuild tariff wall

    The United States is proposing a new 10-per-cent tariff on Canada and other trading partners in an attempt to rebuild the tariff wall that was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year.  

    However, the proposed tariff appears to maintain an exemption for Canadian products that comply with the rules of the continental trade agreement – a carve-out that would significantly reduce the bite of the tariffs

    Late Tuesday evening, the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office published a statement laying out tariffs of between 10 per cent and 12.5 per cent on 60 countries. The office said the tariffs are being imposed because of countries’ failure to curb imports of products made with forced labour – an allegation Canada and other U.S. trade partners have disputed.

    USTR names Canada among six economies it says have “failed to effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.” The other five on the list are Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, and Pakistan. These countries face a 10-per-cent tariff. 

    However, the Federal Register document spelling out the proposed tariffs notes that they would not apply to “USMCA-compliant goods of Canada or Mexico.” This echoes the exemption that Canadian and Mexican products had to earlier baseline tariffs the Trump administration imposed. 

    Another 54 countries, which the U.S. says have failed to impose and enforce a forced labour prohibition, face a higher 12.5-per-cent tariff.

    Opinion: Is Canada even serious about confronting forced labour?

    Prime Minister Mark Carney said the “vast, vast, vast majority of Canadian trade” would be unaffected by the new levy and the state of play would be “the same as before.” 

    He also promised changes to Canadian laws and regulations against the use of forced and child labour in the country’s supply chains to make the rules more effective. Such changes, he said, would be unveiled over the coming weeks. “We support the overall objective” of eliminating forced labour, he told reporters before a caucus meeting on Parliament Hill on Wednesday. “We’re working towards making it more effective.”

    The proposed tariffs do not come into force immediately. There will first be a public comment and review period, in which the tariff proposals may change. Written comments are due on July 6 and hearings will happen on July 7. 

    The proposed Section 301 levies are an attempt by the Trump administration to recreate the tariff regime that the U.S. Supreme Court partly dismantled in February. 

    Through much of last year, U.S. President Donald Trump relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to place tariffs on dozens of trading partners in an attempt to restructure the global trading order and squeeze concessions from other countries. 

    But this tool was taken away from the administration in February when the Supreme Court found that Mr. Trump was acting beyond the powers granted to him under the act by Congress.

    The administration responded by implementing a new round of temporary tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allow the President to levy tariffs for up to 150 days. These tariffs, which have maintained the carve-out for USMCA-compliant goods, are set to expire on July 24

    USTR also launched two Sec. 301 investigations: One into forced labour and one into “structural excess capacity” in manufacturing. Canada is not subject to the latter investigation.

    The U.S. has used Sec. 301 tariffs against China for years, and they are seen by trade experts as a more legally durable basis for the administration’s tariff regime.

    Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, before the Sec. 301 tariff announcement, Dominic LeBlanc, Canada’s minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, said that the possibility of new tariffs was “something that we have been preparing for.”

    “We have made submissions to the United States that we think are very significant in addressing the concerns that the United States has raised [about forced labour] for a number of months,” Mr. LeBlanc said in Washington, after meeting with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer earlier in the day. 

    LeBlanc offers ‘specific proposals’ to end trade war, calls for USMCA to be renewed for 16 years

    In the meeting, he said, he discussed Canada’s commitment to dealing with forced labour with Mr. Greer.

    Mr. LeBlanc would not say how Canada would respond to 301 tariffs, including whether it would retaliate, but said he would continue trying to land a trade deal with the U.S.

    “We don’t get panicked by turbulence. We’re not going to take off our seatbelt, walk around the aisle, break down the cockpit door and start pushing buttons in front of the pilots,” he said.

    Ottawa is negotiating along two lines. It is trying to get the United States to lower sectoral tariffs on autos, industrial metals and wood products, while aiming to successfully renew the USMCA agreement. The trilateral trade deal is up for mandatory review on July 1, although all three countries have said they expect negotiations to continue beyond that date.

    On Wednesday, the Canadian government moved to defuse one trade irritant with the U.S. by backpedalling on requirements that foreign streaming services pay for Canadian content.

    Culture Minister Marc Miller ordered the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission to review an order issued last month for foreign streamers and Canadian broadcasters to spend money to either buy or produce Canadian-made programs.

    The Online Streaming Act of 2023, under which the CRTC issued its requirements, has been a source of complaint for the U.S. government. The law was meant to update Canadian content requirements for the age of digital media.

  • FIRST READING: Is the technical recession recession just a technicality, technically?

    On Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre rejected reports that Canada was in “technical recession,” saying that the country’s economic malaise was not a “technicality.”

    Article content

    “(Prime Minister Mark) Carney says we’re not in a real recession, as he sent out his Liberal commentators and economists to say it’s just a technicality,” said Poilievre at a press conference announcing that Canada was in the grip of a “full-blown Carney Recession.”

    Article content

    Article content

    On Friday, Statistics Canada announced that GDP had gone down in the first quarter of 2026. This indeed marks Canada’s official entry into the generally accepted definition of “recession,” but only by one of the smallest possible margins in Canadian economic history.

    Recessions are generally “called” after two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. In other words, a country’s economy has shrunk for at least six months.

    Article content

    In the final quarter of 2025, the Canadian economy shrunk by one per cent. And then, in the first quarter of 2026, it contracted again by the razor thin margin of 0.1 per cent.

    Article content

    In December 2025, Canadian GDP was pegged at $2,339,770,000,000 in 2017 dollars. At the end of March, it came in at $2,339,730,000,000 in 2017 dollars. A difference of about $400 million is what delivered the 0.1 per cent decline, and thus tipped Canada into recession.

    Article content

    Robert Kavcic, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, wrote in a note to investors that the decline in the Canadian economy seen over the last six months is “barely a scratch in GDP terms.”

    Article content

    The 0.1 per cent decline in the first quarter of 2026 is such a tight margin that it’s entirely possible that if the end of March had come a few days later or earlier, the stats would not have shown a recession at all.

    Article content

    Article content

    In February, the Canadian economy had actually been growing; GDP grew by an average of about $150 million per day. But in March, all these gains were reversed by an average daily GDP decline of about $113 million.

    A May 29 note by RBC economist Nathan Janzen, for instance, suggested that the 0.1 per cent decline may already be gone. Although Janzen warned that estimates are “highly revision prone,” the early GDP estimates for April were showing a 0.4 per cent increase, driven in part by high oil prices.

    Article content

    The Conservatives’ point, however, is that Canada’s entry into recession is only the latest indicator of ill health for an economy that was supposed to be running at full speed.

    Article content

    Poilievre noted that insolvencies are currently at highs not seen since 2009, Canadian household debt remains the highest in the G7, and unemployment is currently the second worst in the G7.

    Article content

    The latest Statistics Canada figures show unemployment at 6.9 per cent, slightly worse than the 6.8 per cent Canada was posting when Carney was first sworn in as prime minister in March 2025.

    Article content

    Canada is also the only developed country whose last two quarters have been defined by contraction, however slight.

    “Why is it that only Canada, after a year of Mark Carney, is in a recession today?” said Poilievre on Monday.

    Article content

    The term “technical recession” has been used among financial circles for at least the last 100 years. As early as 1917, a report in the Vancouver Sun noted that the auto sector was experiencing “technical recessions” as a result of U.S. entry into the First World War.

    Article content

    But it’s only been within the last few decades that “technical recession” has entered heavy usage within the Canadian political lexicon as politicians began litigating economic contractions based on fractions of a per cent.

    Article content

    The first recorded mention of “technical recession” in the House of Commons was in 1990 by Geoff Wilson, minister of finance under then prime minister Brian Mulroney. When the Liberal opposition accused Wilson of what he called the “r-word,” Wilson replied, “If there is that decline in output in the current quarter then we would have a technical recession.”

    Article content

    In the midst of the 2008 Great Recession, then prime minister Stephen Harper used the term “technical recession” to describe Canada’s relatively mild experience of the downturn.

    Article content

    Article content

    Harper’s final months in office would come to be characterized by two consecutive quarters of decline driven in part by plummeting oil prices, leading to years of Liberal claims that they took power amidst a “technical recession.”

    Article content

    “When we took office in 2015, the Canadian economy was sluggish, and Canada was in a technical recession,” Liberal MP Joël Lightbound said in one typical 2019 statement to the House of Commons.

  • US: Job openings in April surged to 7.6 million, the highest in nearly two years

    • The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that available employment hit 7.6 million for April, a surge of 731,000 from the prior month and the highest level since May 2024.
    • While openings jumped, the hiring rate slipped. Companies hired a total 5.12 million workers during the month, a decline of 419,000 from March.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/02/job-openings-april-2026.html

  • Oil jumps more than 4% as Trump tells CNBC he doesn’t care if Iran negotiations are over

    • President Donald Trump told CNBC’s Eamon Javers in a phone interview that he doesn’t care if talks with Iran are over.
    • Iranian state media reported earlier that Tehran will halt talks with the U.S. in response to Israeli attacks in Lebanon.
    • Trump subsequently posted on social media that talks with Iran are continuing.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/01/oil-prices-wti-brent-crude-israel-lebanon-hezbollah-iran-trump-us.html